User talk:Ryuzaki

What

Did you re-add a MOCKUP? SoyMario2011 (talk) 15:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

This wiki also cover fake builds and mockups, but only if they confuse too much people (or a widely-known fake). In this case, the Interface Manager mockup was pretty popular at its time. — Preceding SIGNED comment added by insomnia {{ talk • contribs}} | 15:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

How dare you 2

You undid the AUTOEXEC part on Windows 1.0 Alpha MaritoEdits (talk) 18:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

It's purely an optional patch to start Windows without typing win, and no, patches that are not required to make Windows start normally are not allowed here. — Preceding SIGNED comment added by insomnia {{ talk • contribs}} | 12:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

About the Japanese Whistler Tablet PC interview

What about put the interview content to the 2296 or tablet pc edition section?I cannot translate the Japanese through. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 133.167.104.237 (talk • contribs)

How did you create my talk page

I can't create it so how did you create it? Username.php (talk) 07:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Now that I try it, I can't access it either. Please pick a new username since your current one breaks some wiki software functionality. --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 07:47, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

here is where you can access this: location 2001:F90:6029:C932:828:3164:19A8:CDE6 10:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

20135

Why you say the build I found is a blatant hoax? I not know myself but I dont see why it cant be unconfirmed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windowsuser7902 (talk • contribs)

You provided exactly zero sources for the build tag, therefore it has been removed. Surely if you found it then you can tell us where you found it, instead of creating a pastebin with zero context. --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 20:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

I didnt create that's pastebin I found it in the pastebin --User:Windowsuser7902/Signature 23:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

And the fact it was created only 6 minutes before you posted it here is just a coincidence, right? --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 20:59, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

I have no idea when it was created I was simply searching random build numbers to try find some thing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windowsuser7902 (talk • contribs)

Hello why you block me now ? I make pages not bad pages and not do bad or add uncomfirmed build ! So why the block ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windowsuser7902 (talk • contribs)

Hello please respond faster for why block , I have been waiting to get unblock but its still not unblock — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windowsuser7902 (talk • contribs)

Also cap tcha is hard so I unable answer it some times, make easier please

Undelete page

Can you please undelete Template talk:Unblock? 157.97.132.199 05:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

No, talk pages for non-existent pages are eligible for quick deletion. --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 09:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

So does that mean a non-autoconfirmed user who does not have permission to edit in userspace cannot create sandboxes without getting deleted in User talk:EXAMPLE/sandbox 190.92.9.46 10:06, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

That is exactly what that means. Talk pages are mostly for for talking with others about the content of the article. --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 19:15, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Because non-autoconfirmed users cannot create user sandboxes, how about we reduce the autoconfirmed requirements from 96 hours and 10 edits to 864 minutes and 10 edits. (I chose 864 minutes to balance ratio with extended confirmed.) 188.241.178.86 21:10, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

No - Mainnn (talk) 21:14, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Why not? 30x1440=43200 43200/500=86.4 864/10=86.4 82.103.131.250 21:19, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

.....maybe because it's fine as is? Mainnn (talk) 21:23, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed is 16.6(recuring) edits per day but autoconfirmed only 2.5 edits per day. Why are the ratios different? 84.38.134.147 21:27, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Why do they have to be the same? There is perfect sense in prioritizing account age for the lower level and number of edits for the higher level, but it's not worth explaining to someone who makes a big deal out of counting months because the number of days is not always the same --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 11:02, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

There is no need to waste disk space on sandboxes for users who can't bother to make 10 edits during four days. --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 11:06, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Loosen block for UsernameDotPeeAitchPee

Can you please loosen the block for UsernameDotPeeAitchPee? You blocked them because of sockpuppetry but the IP socks are proxies. The IP addresses might not be operated by UsernameDotPeeAitchPee. 45.64.98.116 21:17, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

We know it's you, just stop Slovensky2000 (talk) 21:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

How do you know it is UsernameDotPeeAitchPee? 84.38.134.147 21:27, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Mate, this has been going on for two months at this point, and you're still trying. If you maybe actually waited out your block and didn't create a bunch of alt accounts to support your claim then this wouldn't have happened. Mainnn (talk) 21:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

If you are improperly blocked for sockpuppetry, you should realize that it may not always be easy or even possible to correct the situation. 103.152.255.235 21:24, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

I agree and support 154.205.154.42 21:43, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Please touch some grass, this little roleplay of yours is neither entertaining nor fooling anyone. --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 10:56, 15 February 2025 (UTC)