Talk:Windows Vista build 3790.1232

Untitiled topic by 93.170.187.145

I mean you can't say it is much of a Windows Vista build when it is the modificated version of a Windows Server 2003 Post-RTM build! Can you tell me why is everybody considering it to be that of Longhorn? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.170.187.145 (talk • contribs)

Firstly, that build is compiled under winmain branch, a new main build that lasted until possibly February 2022. Second, it has Longhorn EULA, and last thing is the build that you said is exists, but still not leaked until today. 😸 Hi. I'm NekoSam395. (💬 | 👨‍💻) 18:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Every single version of Windows (except 1.0 and NT 3.1, obviously) started out as a "modified" version of the previous one. That's how development works. Just because it doesn't look like Longhorn doesn't mean it isn't Longhorn. Plus, as mentioned above, the build was compiled from a branch that was introduced by post-reset Longhorn. --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 19:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)