Talk:Windows NT 4.0

Editions table[edit source]

Is it really needed to use a table for the editions? I am sure a regular list would do better. --AlphaBeta (talk) 04:26, 30 November 2015 (GMT)

I Symbol support vote.png Support
table markup. It makes it easier to see, at least for me. Tau Ceti (talk) 03:44, 11 December 2015 (GMT)
Having a template for support and denial also is unneeded, especially when it breaks the page layout. --AlphaBeta (talk) 12:49, 15 December 2015 (GMT)
I did not feel that an entire heading was necessary for each edition... User99672 (talk) 04:33, 11 December 2015 (GMT)
That's an other extreme. --AlphaBeta (talk) 12:49, 15 December 2015 (GMT)

Are there "official" RC builds of NT 4.0?[edit source]

As builds 1345 (RC1) and 1369 (RC2) are not described as "official" Release Candidate builds, were they actually confirmed by MS as "official" RC builds? - Windows logo (2001).svg Bob2204 Arrow.png Click here to begin. Or here. Arrow2.png Talk 12:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)