User talk:Microsoft Windows XP

I love Windows XP! But its dead at 8 April 2014 (Rip for Windows XP) :( Ok, i opened this account for editing pages about Windows...

Guidelines

You haven't read them, have you? I assume the same about the 5001 topic on BA that you linked to in the respective article. --AlphaBeta (talk) 17:14, 23 September 2017 (BST)

I was edited your Windows Vista build 5001 page because that build is fake! You can believe from this page:https://www.betaarchive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=28066.I dont know the build but photos are fake.So, i think build is fake too! The "lh" letter looks some weird at winver photo, for you too? --Microsoft Windows XP (talk) 20:24, 23 September 2017

It wouldn't be the first time somebody at Microsoft did something similar. See Windows 2000 ia64 or Windows Server 2003 x64 betas. --AlphaBeta (talk) 19:19, 23 September 2017 (BST)

lol, some betaarchive or other Windows website users always making fake and weird photos... Im sorry for editing your page without a proper proof --Microsoft Windows XP (talk) 18:06, 26 September 2017

Yet again,looks like your articles don't really follow the Guidelines. That's why your articles were moved to Hall of Shame, e.g HallOfShame:Microsoft Cairo, you should be writing something more constuctive and not claiming the respective build is fake with no proper proof and just guessing. --Ovctvct (talk) 14:44, 25 September 2017 (BST)

I dont know about build but photos of Windows Vista build 5001 are really looks like fake.The "lh" letter is so weird... -_- Build can be real but photos are %100 fake! Thats not a proper proof for you? And, i know right.My HallOfShame:Microsoft Cairo page is not constructive -_- Im sorry for it... --Microsoft Windows XP (talk) 18:12, 26 September 2017

Guys, please remove my pages from Hall Of Shame and put them back! I readed Guidelines and i wont claim other user's pages fake without a proper proof! Im sorry for this! --Microsoft Windows XP (talk) 18:39, 26 September 2017

First, your articles are not being removed from the Hall of Shame, which is where they rightfully belong. Second, you claim that you have read the Guidelines, but have you noticed that removing content from talk pages is forbidden. This is your last warning. --AlphaBeta (talk) 18:59, 26 September 2017 (BST)