User talk:Jurta

Suggestion[edit source]

I’m just saying for a friendly reminder that covering update builds is against this wiki’s rules. (talk | contribs) 12:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

yeah, i didn't know that, my bad.Jurta (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Read this article if you want to know about this wiki's rules. Nara Insider (talk) 13:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Windows 11 build 22000.100[edit source]

According to Xeno's user page, it says that 22000.100 is an real build of Windows 11, and will be an 4th Insider build of Windows 11. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wabbah (talkcontribs)

It's unconfirmed as it's from one tweet, this does not warrant a page creation. If further proof of this build/revision surfaces, then feel free to make a page. Xeno (talk) 18:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

iOS 16[edit source]

Information about 'iOS 16' mentioned from some blogs, and I had tried to improve this page. Please reply if this article have some shortcomings. 我是王牌66 (talk) 10:45, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Just because it's mentioned in some random blog you found online doesn't mean that there's proof it exists, these blogs only speculate that it's a real thing, they don't outright say that it is. Jurta (talk) 10:49, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
But before iOS 15 announced, someone had created about 'iOS 15' (, also from some blogs, so 'iOS 16' is also can. 我是王牌66 (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Just because someone did it previously doesn't mean you can do it. Jurta (talkcontribs) 10:57, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
before iOS 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or 15 announced, in Baidu Baike, many users want to created a page about an OS that willed be announced equip some exposure blog links, Even back to the year before the OS announced. Baidu Baike is an famous encyclopedia, so I do like it. 我是王牌66 (talk) 11:06, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
What are you even talking about? Jurta (talkcontribs) 11:13, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

NT 196[edit source]

Windows NT 3.1 build 196‎ diffhist −380‎ Jurta talk contribs Undo revision 144946 by Xyz (talk) Tag: Undo Why did you undo this change? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xyz (talkcontribs)

Because the third-party modifications are redundant, because Jurta says so. (talk) 11:30, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Not because I say so but because they aren't part of the build and aren't made by Microsoft themselves, most of the stuff is unnecessary anyway. Jurta (talkcontribs) 11:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Its really annoying to deal with users like you who create their own rules and permanently ruin the work of others. Xyz (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
No need for that attitude. Maybe if you lay out how your contributions are noteworthy then maybe I'll understand better. Jurta (talkcontribs) 12:14, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
I'm not the one who undos other's changes without any information why. I gave you this information already and if you see an issue with my contributions you can still inform an admin about it who then will decide for us. But I will not allow you to bother me with your personal opinion about what can be added to articles and what not. allows me to add the infos. Xyz (talk) 12:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey, sorry about that, I should've looked more into the guidelines before reverting your edit and stuff, should've said this earlier. Jurta (talkcontribs) 12:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
If you leave out the tool part, the edit still adds some valuable information about the bug and working around it, so I don't see any reason to revert the entire edit. Furthermore, it's not even a modification, it's just a tool that changes file dates in a bulk. The files themselves don't get modified. --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 13:28, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, I didn't know that, mb. Jurta (talkcontribs) 13:45, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Big Sur 20A4299u, not a wrong typo[edit source]

This website said 20A4299u and 20A4299v, two builds are both ok. 我是王牌66 14:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC) (talk)

20A4299v is the only correct build tag, 20A4299u is merely a typo and nothing else. Jurta (talkcontribs) 14:44, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Two chapter are replied by 我是王牌66:
❶What? You also have a typo? 20A4299 typoed to 20A4229?
❷20A4299u, 20A4299v and 20A5299w, all three are OK:
A. macOS Big Sur 11.5.1 DMG Firmware | Page 22
Jun 27, 2020 · macOS Big Sur 11.0 Beta 1 (20A4299u) Developer Prewiew macOS Big Sur 11.0 (10.16.0) 1st macOS Big Sur 11.0 Beta 1 (20A4299v) – 06/22/20 Requirements
B. MacOS Big Sur 11.0 Beta 1 DMG system image DP Beta 1-IOS……
2020-6-24 - Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 Beta 1 DMG System Image DP Beta 1 Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 Beta 1 (20A 4299 U) DMG System Image Download Development Test Version macOS Big Sur……
And more you can found as shown below:
Search results can found in [[1]], [[2]], and [[3]] and [[4]].
So it is not unfamous / infamous. This means it is a fact. This also means it is not a typo.
我是王牌66 15:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC) (talkcontributions)
The people in the blog post are merely copy-pasting the text from the blog, if that wasn't obvious before, and all the websites that pop up from searching up the typo are merely referencing each other or are just duplicates of each other. Besides, a build can NOT have more than one build tag, they all have their own unique tag to differentiate them apart. Jurta (talkcontribs) 15:09, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
I think it is not a typo. Both are OK. 我是王牌66 04:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC) (talkcontributions)
It's a typo, there is no other mentions of "20A4299u" on the internet other than some duplicates of the original blog that the typo originally appeared in. And, like I said, a build can't have two build tags associated with it. Jurta (talkcontribs) 15:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
According to the author of that article, it has two different build, this means it is not a typo. 我是王牌66 08:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
There is no mention of it being two different builds anywhere in the article. Jurta (talkcontribs) 08:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

EI Capitan and EL Capitan[edit source]

Some websites called 'ei capitan', some website called 'el capitan', both are having some encyclopedia source. These encyclopedia also need auditing. 我是王牌66 12:32; 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Reminder that some people misinterpret the lowercase L as an uppercase I, is it really that hard to understand? Jurta (talkcontribs) 12:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Both' EI' and' EL' pages exist, and both of them are leading and largest encyclopediae, also need auditing. Can't you understand this? --我是王牌66 (talk | contribs) 12:39, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
EI and El look very similar, so I understand your confusion, though, you should be using Apple's name for the OS, not some Chinese encyclopedia's misinterpretation. Jurta (talkcontribs) 12:43, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Software Page had mention a name called 'ei capitan'. --我是王牌66 (talk | contribs) 12:47, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
No it didn't, you're just seeing it as that. Jurta (talkcontribs) 12:50, 20 August 2021 (UTC) this is an software source, please do not misunderstand it, also mentioned in!!! --我是王牌66 (talk | contribs) 12:55, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
In the image in the first link that you sent, you can clearly see that the second letter in "El Capitan" is taller than a capital I, which is the main difference between a lowercase L and a capital I. Jurta (talkcontribs) 13:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
EL and EI are both ok, mentioned in the second link. --我是王牌66 (talk | contribs) 13:05, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
I am not quite sure what's your point there. EI Capitan with an uppercase I is wrong spelling. Apple calls it El Capitan, it's called after a rock formation called El Capitan and just because some people clearly couldn't tell an uppercase I from a lowercase L doesn't mean there should be a redirect. There is none on English Wikipedia. --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 13:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC) If you use this link, you can search in this page, for 'ei', there are many results in this page, and 'el' has no. --我是王牌66 (talk | contribs) 13:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)