User talk:Callum90ish

I think you're a really good contributor, and the sort of user the wiki needs in these times... I'm a VIP user here, and have been editing the wiki for quite a while now. Just contact me! Tau Ceti (talk) 05:54, 23 February 2015 (GMT)

Regarding 4093

Well, where did you find the info that 4093 is the only M9 build? I thought it was M8. I couldn't find proof anywhere for it. From what I know, 5048 and other unleaked builds around it are M9.(ovctvct) --2001:470:1F1A:292:0:0:0:2 14:44, 7 September 2015 (BST)

I've seen evidence that 4093 is a M9 build. We know that Longhorn had a M9, but since after 4093 the code was reset, 5048 can hardly be a M9 build, can it? - Callum90ish (talk) - 8:39, 8th September 2015 (NZDT)

4093 is an M9 build. I wrote that originally, it's on BA if you need a source. Tau Ceti (talk) 00:43, 8 September 2015 (BST)

Also: 5048 is not an M9 build, it's an Omega-13 build. They used a different system, rather than milestones, after the reset. Tau Ceti (talk) 00:45, 8 September 2015 (BST)

Exactly my point. Longhorn post-reset "Milestones" (if that's what you want to call them) were: Omega-13, Beta 1, Beta 2, RC1 and RC2. 4093 is the only confirmed M9 build, and if there are others, there aren't many, that's for sure. callum90ish (talk) 12:04, 8th September 2015 (NZDT)

And also

As well as 'Whistler', I'll also do early Windows and DOS (i.e. before 95), as well as whatever non-Windows OSes I can find. Tau Ceti (talk) 08:57, 8 October 2015 (BST)