User talk:Blue Horizon

I don't think it's worth it to add categories on every single build of Windows

Sure, Gamerappa did it last year but apparently he only did it for a "video project" that got scrapped. Since builds can be found much more easily with, in this case, the Windows 95 article. Adding "Windows 95 Builds" to every single build of 95 is not worth it. -TvMusic (talk) 19:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Personally I don't think it hurts anything. Some tidying up never killed anyone. --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 19:38, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Longhorn 4020 (idx02.030430-2218)

Hello. Longhorn build 4020 (idx02.030430-2218) is just the wrong name for the actual build 4020. This was discovered a year ago. Thanks. Captainlinux8880 (talk) 12:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

I would need to know more information about this than just a simple claim with no sources attached. I may be reading in-between the lines here. This may not add to anything; but I talked to mrpijey about this build and asked him if he could deeply search his archive, and he came up with nothing. So in that regard, perhaps Grabberslasher was unaware of this mislabel and just distributed it as is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blue Horizon (talk • contribs)

i think it is the version string of serveral files as well, in a similar regard to xp build 2469 and server 2003 build 3505. How i found this out? Use reshacker. Correct me if im wrong MikeShinoda2001 (talk) 00:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003 wallpaper

As you uploaded images of Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003, do you know how the branding wallpaper of it looks like? Does it also bear the Compute Cluster Server branding or did it retain the one from Windows Server 2003? Bob2204 Click here to begin. Or here. Talk 17:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

No, the wallpaper was still the same and unchanged from its usual counterpart. If it was different, I would've included it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blue Horizon (talk • contribs)