Talk:Windows Server 2003 build 3787

Professional Version?

So this is a thing: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/115791758220?hash=item1af5ba038c:g:1OEAAOSwuCBkUYs2&amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAAAwInwPIX%2FaV5%2Fhzawg%2FYsA%2F%2Bv%2BT8fr6gVLfvmcDe4BjlZOsWuTInxCzLnOzDJCKYWiWf50MNmZw%2FwuCDjHvT0yqTjFY2Rk7HFXWNJcb2K1m9o06yqw1muHGMoLPa846jjMqA%2B3Ki5a65MiK0siCmJPUWunsr7WU3G1VwgzmjfRpzcnH6ZKljVgrWLfAqmYAL4d8hMyXSI6sG0cYfpfl8RO3poK9tP3haIccQtKoLL24UObMc%2BcdblutimtwQ3hRnAjw%3D%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR5zU1tn9YQ i have no idea why this version was even compiled because server 2003 never had a professional edition as far as I’m aware NitroGD 20:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

This is Windows XP build 3787 Xeno (talk) 20:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Then why is it labeled as Server 2003? NitroGD 09:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Because the CD identifies it as Windows Server 2003 for unknown reasons. NaraInsider1694 (talk) 09:46, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

More likely because XP 64-bit Edition is based on Server 2003, as seen in the NT kernel version being 5.2. - Bob2204 Click here to begin. Or here. Talk - 10:21, 6 May 2023 (UTC)