Talk:Windows 1.0 Premiere Edition
Screenshots[edit source]
Needs more screenshots. --LilShootDawg (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2017 (BST)
- Then make some and add them to the article. We are not your slaves. --AlphaBeta (talk) 18:37, 12 May 2017 (BST)
- Sorry before I got the VM working. --LilShootDawg (talk) 13:15, 30 May 2017 (BST)
It's fake![edit source]
That image of an IBM PC/AT from Microsoft's FTP is fake. I searched image of that computer and it fake. Here's why:
- too clear
- too bright
- too flat
- Ahh... It just dosen't feel... REAL!?
It's fake! --2001:8A0:E579:7F01:B948:8B5F:9993:ED25 18:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for repeating what the article section already said! --Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 00:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Don't give fakers publicity[edit source]
I do understand that we should mention which users leaked the real thing to animate others to also leak their gems, but why does Betawiki give fakers so much publicity? I wouldnt mention the fakes and their douchebag leakers at all and remove all of that stuff from the articles. Xyz (talk) 12:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Though I get your point with the leakers' names, personally I don't see any problem with mentioning commonly known faked versions of real builds themselves (such as in this case). The fake PE mention is there in case people would confuse it with the real thing. ToMi (talk) 12:27, 2 December 2023 (UTC)