11,866
edits
Windows Vista build 5112: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Pivotman319 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
At this point in development, Microsoft had decided that '''Windows Vista''' would be the final name of the operating system, hoping to boost the image and perception of the product among end users. Jim Allchin himself expressed his feelings for the name, stating: | At this point in development, Microsoft had decided that '''Windows Vista''' would be the final name of the operating system, hoping to boost the image and perception of the product among end users. Jim Allchin himself expressed his feelings for the name, stating: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote>'''Vista' creates the right imagery for the new product capabilities and inspires the imagination with all the possibilities of what can be done with Windows – making people’s passions come alive.''</blockquote> | ||
However, the name Longhorn was still used in numerous areas, such as within the ''About Windows'' dialog box, the registry entry for Winlogon, and on the boot screen. This is to be expected, considering the point at which this build was compiled (it was compiled two days before the announcement of the name change to Vista). The name Vista was only mentioned on the desktop watermark. | |||
Build [[Windows Vista build 5099|5099]] or later is required to upgrade to this build, but it is possible to flawlessly upgrade from [[Windows Vista build 5098|5098]] by replacing the sources folder (excluding <code>install.wim</code>) from 5098 itself. | Build [[Windows Vista build 5099|5099]] or later is required to upgrade to this build, but it is possible to flawlessly upgrade from [[Windows Vista build 5098|5098]] by replacing the sources folder (excluding <code>install.wim</code>) from 5098 itself. | ||