User talk:Pivotman319

If 22000.132.co_svc_refresh is a microsoft placebo and not a real build ?

Then why it is marked as confirmed and why there are .ESD files for this build ? - PikaaxYT ([[User talk:Pikaax YT|Talk) 21 August 2023 13:28 (UTC)

@Pikaxx YT It's just placeholder buildtag used for esds, also 22000.132.co_release_svc_refresh and other builds that have XX_release_XX_refresh branches, are not available, neither compiled HarpHarpaster (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

So how I have installed Windows 11 from that ISO if the build was never compiled, are the ESD files renamed and actually they are from 22000.132 co release ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PikaaxYT (talk • contribs)

You ought to look into HKLM\SYSTEM\Software\Microsoft\BuildLayers\OSClient - pivotman319 (📫) 22:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Page Requests

Please create pages for the following unleaked Phoenix builds:

Most likely tiger

https://discussions.apple.com/thread/682750?sortBy=best

Mountain Lion

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/refurb-27-imac-broken-out-of-box.1752596/#post-19335169

https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5070949

Snow Leopard

https://twitter.com/eduardolomb/status/949840864628629504 (original forum post is lost)

Sierra

The main post of https://twitter.com/eduardolomb/status/949840864628629504 and it’s replies.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8001:8400:dc34:15d0:4ba5:3ad8:c612 (talk • contribs)

A little question

10.0.15254.388 is an internal build and has not been pushed. Should it be retained? - Kurihito (talk) 12:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

If a CU build (from a public release branch, e.g.: vb_release, winblue_gdr or feature2) has no significant user-facing changes that are worth discussing, it's probably a better idea to not make a page for it. Refer to the notability guidelines for further information. - pivotman319 (📫) 14:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)