User talk:Pivotman319
If 22000.132.co_svc_refresh is a microsoft placebo and not a real build ?
Then why it is marked as confirmed and why there are .ESD files for this build ? - PikaaxYT ([[User talk:Pikaax YT|Talk) 21 August 2023 13:28 (UTC)
- @Pikaxx YT It's just placeholder buildtag used for esds, also 22000.132.co_release_svc_refresh and other builds that have XX_release_XX_refresh branches, are not available, neither compiled HarpHarpaster (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- So how I have installed Windows 11 from that ISO if the build was never compiled, are the ESD files renamed and actually they are from 22000.132 co release ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PikaaxYT (talk • contribs)
- You ought to look into
HKLM\SYSTEM\Software\Microsoft\BuildLayers\OSClient- pivotman319 (📫) 22:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- You ought to look into
- So how I have installed Windows 11 from that ISO if the build was never compiled, are the ESD files renamed and actually they are from 22000.132 co release ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PikaaxYT (talk • contribs)
Page Requests
Please create pages for the following unleaked Phoenix builds:
Most likely tiger
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/682750?sortBy=best
Mountain Lion
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/refurb-27-imac-broken-out-of-box.1752596/#post-19335169
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5070949
Snow Leopard
https://twitter.com/eduardolomb/status/949840864628629504 (original forum post is lost)
Sierra
The main post of https://twitter.com/eduardolomb/status/949840864628629504 and it’s replies.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8001:8400:dc34:15d0:4ba5:3ad8:c612 (talk • contribs)
A little question
10.0.15254.388 is an internal build and has not been pushed. Should it be retained? - Kurihito (talk) 12:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- If a CU build (from a public release branch, e.g.:
vb_release,winblue_gdrorfeature2) has no significant user-facing changes that are worth discussing, it's probably a better idea to not make a page for it. Refer to the notability guidelines for further information. - pivotman319 (📫) 14:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
macOS 20A2261g
I can agree with you, that on some official betas name 10.16 was preserved for compatibility reasons, but on this build, and on a few later internal ones even About this Mac shows 10.16. I see this is the same story like on the last classic Mac OS version, a few earliest build were named 7.7 instead of 8.0 and 8.7 instead of 9.0.
Inquiry on Windows Vista / Server 2008 6003 update builds
I need to note that this is not some angry comment on a change or anything, it is to understand the motivation behind the restoration of the changes concerning Windows Vista build 6003.
It appears that many users have gone their way to look for all the builds that could be installed on Vista, which are all valid, as you could still install them if you had the files. I would agree the page is too cluttered for just build 6003 and the content itself should be placed on another page, but please (1) state clearly the reasons the reverting the changes, and provide (2) any relevant communication between other members (if any) regarding this change, as I am not so close to the Discord part of the community.
Please note "butchered the damn page" is not an ideal explanation for reverting the changes, and please refrain from using obscene language on a wiki. Thanks for your time and effort on BetaWiki. - TipzTeam (talk) 13:19, 19 August 2024 (HKT)