https://betawiki.net/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=2001%3AF90%3A40C0%3AA072%3A9064%3A7759%3AA919%3AA94&feedformat=atom
BetaWiki - User contributions [en]
2024-03-28T18:31:22Z
User contributions
MediaWiki 1.39.6
https://betawiki.net/index.php?title=Server_Manager&diff=230204
Server Manager
2022-08-30T08:32:38Z
<p>2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{Infobox Windows component<br />
|name = Server Manager<br />
|screenshot = S14393-FirstBoot.png<br />
|caption = Server Manager in [[Windows Server 2016]]<br />
|introduced in = [[Windows Server 2008]]<br />
|logo=Server-Manager-logo.png|128px<br />
}}<br />
'''Server Manager''' is [[Windows Server]] application that included on Windows Server 2008.<br />
<br />
== Gallery ==<br />
<gallery><br />
Winserv2k8r2servermanager.png|Server Manager in [[Windows Server 2008]]/[[Windows Server 2008 R2|2008 R2]]<br />
Server_Manager_2_w1.png|Server Manager in [[Windows Server 2012 build 7904]]<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
[[Category:Windows_components]]</div>
2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94
https://betawiki.net/index.php?title=Windows_10_build_14278.1005&diff=230199
Windows 10 build 14278.1005
2022-08-30T08:10:46Z
<p>2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{Infobox Windows build<br />
|build of = [[Windows 10 Anniversary Update]]<br />
|image = Win10-14278-1005desktop.png<br />
|winver = Win10-14278-1005winver.png<br />
|arch = x64<br />
|buildtag = 10.0.14278.1005.rs1_onecore_mqbase1_bpt3.160306-1830<br />
|sku=Home<br/>Pro<br />
|compiled = 2016-03-06<br />
|timebomb = 2016-07-15<br />
|key = ''Use a Windows 10 Retail serial''<br />
|rivals={{rivals|TCB=https://thecollectionbook.info/windows/10-v1607/3391|TCBGallery=https://www.thecollectionbook.info/gallery/?f=/windows/nt%20kernel/windows%2010%20v1607/10.0.14278.1005/english/pro}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
'''Windows 10 build 14278.1005''' is a build of [[Windows 10 Anniversary Update]]. This build is only available in the Home and Pro SKUs only in the x64 architecture.<br />
<br />
== Gallery ==<br />
<gallery><br />
Win8boot.png|Boot screen<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
[[Category:Windows 10 Anniversary Update builds]]<br />
[[Category:Windows 10 builds]]</div>
2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94
https://betawiki.net/index.php?title=BetaWiki:Community_portal&diff=230018
BetaWiki:Community portal
2022-08-29T23:43:14Z
<p>2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94: /* Any way to access the original Watercolor theme used on this site? */</p>
<hr />
<div>__NEWSECTIONLINK__<br />
{{fmbox|type=system|image=none|text=<center><br />
<span style="font-size: 150%;">Welcome to BetaWiki community portal!</span><br />
<br />
This is where we discuss the operations of BetaWiki. Please help us to set down policies and guidelines, improve articles and more.<br />
<br />
If you want to request a specific administration action to be done, please use the [[BetaWiki:administrators' noticeboard|administrators' noticeboard]] instead.<br />
<br />
To add discussion, please add a new heading under this line.<br />
</center><br />
}}<br />
{{archives}}<br />
{{TOC|clear=left|limit=2}}<br />
<br />
== GitHub References ==<br />
<br />
While some builds that are mentioned on GitHub come from more than one repository and fall under the acceptable notability guidelines. I believe that the majority are not notable as they just say "Hey, this build exists!", only consist of a build number and don't mention any notable bugs or features. Not to mention that I feel that these build pages clog up their respective OS version pages. <br />
Given that most Win10/Win11 updates have recently been removed, I feel like these references should follow suit. Especially since right now, [[Copper]] is around 45% GitHub references.<br />
<br />
I think there are three potential ways forward:<br />
# Delete and disallow most build references that come from GitHub (This would be extremely unfair)<br />
# Move the references to a separate page and potentially format them into a table as seen on my sandbox. [https://betawiki.net/wiki/User:Xeno/Sandbox#GH_.28Nickel.29 Table Sandbox] (The table is just a personal preference)<br />
# Keep things as is<br />
These are just some thoughts I've had over the last few days. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 21:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:I think the second option you suggested is the most appropriate solution. It serves to mention that we know these builds exists without having a page for each of them. (I also think this idea can be extended to other "unnotable builds" as well, just a list to reference their existence). • [[User:Kiki79250CoC|Kiki79250CoC]] <sup>([[User talk:Kiki79250CoC|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kiki79250CoC|Contribs]] • [[User:Kiki79250CoC/ToasterSpecs|My Toaster™ specs]])</sup> 06:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== I want to create pages! ==<br />
Please, let me create pages! --[[User:PrelevatedInsider|PrelevatedInsider]] ([[User talk:PrelevatedInsider|talk]]) 10:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
:Why? What pages do you want to create? [[User:Jurta|Jurta]] ([[User talk:Jurta|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jurta|contribs]]) 10:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
::My user page and every non-existent pages! --[[User:PrelevatedInsider|PrelevatedInsider]] ([[User talk:PrelevatedInsider|talk]]) 12:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== I want my custom Userpage and Sandbox! ==<br />
I want these to tell others about me and for testing BetaWiki features and my editing skills with condition that nobody will ever touch the page.<br />
--[[User:GoldieAxolotel1320|GoldieAxolotel1320]] ([[User talk:GoldieAxolotel1320|Talk]]) 14:40 Apr 10 2022 GMT+01:00 Warsaw<br />
:You're copying my message! --[[User:PrelevatedInsider|PrelevatedInsider]] ([[User talk:PrelevatedInsider|talk]]) 12:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
: I need this too! --[[User:GoldieAxolotel1320|GoldieAxolotel1320]] ([[User talk:GoldieAxolotel1320|Talk]]) 15:09 Apr 10 2022 GMT+01:00 Warsaw<br />
: Same. --[[User:Vannura|Vannura]] ([[User talk:Vannura|talk]]) 14:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Deprecate The Use of The Term "Development Semester" ==<br />
I don't think Nickel and Copper should be called the 22H1 and 22H2 development semesters, respectively, given that Microsoft has most likely switched to a yearly-based development cycle rather than semester-based with recent internal mentions of Windows 11's 23H2 release being Copper. Some may argue that the development semester is not related to the version number, but it would be very awkward as we get further and further into the future when development semester and the version number diverge (for example, Gallium would be either 23H2 or 25H2). Therefore, I think we should stop using the term "development semester" after Nickel. [[User:Charka123|Charka123]] ([[User talk:Charka123|talk]]) 00:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
:I honestly agree 100%. Imagine the mess in the near future once we reach 2024 or 2025! [[User:Cliria|Cliria]] ([[User talk:Cliria|talk]])<br />
:Well, they are called development semesters for a reason... The 22H2 development semester is for the 2023 release, aka 23H2. Same also applies for 22H1, being called 22H2 instead of 22H1. --[[User:Icanttellyou|Icanttellyou]] ([[User talk:Icanttellyou|talk]]) 09:05, 13 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
:We can't do much until Microsoft confirms that themselves. It's likely we'll just keep it the same until we have enough proof whether Microsoft did switch to development cycles from development semesters. [[User:Jurta|Jurta]] ([[User talk:Jurta|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jurta|contribs]]) 16:25, 13 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Purging [[Vibranium|Vibranium (Win10 2004 thru 21H2)]] and [[Windows 11 (original release)|Cobalt (Win11)]] update pages ==<br />
{{Cpd close}}<br />
To reduce clutter throughout each Windows version's build pages (from VB onwards), I'm holding a vote here to see if anyone's fine with getting rid of the unnecessary update pages for the above mentioned Windows versions, as they do not have any notable changes. The only pages that will be kept (as they feature significant UI changes) are the following:<br />
<br />
==== Vibranium ====<br />
*[[Windows 10 build 19041.329]]<br />
*[[Windows 10 build 19041.423]]<br />
*[[Windows 10 build 19041.962]]<br />
*[[Windows 10 build 19042.608]]<br />
*[[Windows 10 build 19042.844]]<br />
*[[Windows 10 build 19042.962]]<br />
*[[Windows 10 build 19042.1023]]<br />
*[[Windows 10 build 19043.1023]]<br />
*[[Windows 10 build 19044.1499]]<br />
*[[Windows 10 build 19044.1618]]<br />
<br />
==== Cobalt ====<br />
*[[Windows 11 build 22000.282]]<br />
*[[Windows 11 build 22000.466]]<br />
*[[Windows 11 build 22000.526]]<br />
*[[Windows 11 build 22000.588]]<br />
<br />
Let me know what you think about these proposed changes below. - [[User:Pivotman319|pivotman319]] ([[User_talk:Pivotman319|📫]]) 18:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
# Agreed, we should only cover the ones with notable changes. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 18:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# I agree, there is no reason to have pages of builds that don’t contain anything important. [[User:WaterMelon|WaterMelon]] ([[User talk:WaterMelon|talk]]) 18:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# Three's a trio. I'm in favor as there are a ton of unnoteworthy builds and removing some of the update builds is a great start. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 18:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# As the one who began the whole post-GA thing, I fully agree with this. [[User:Jurta|Jurta]] ([[User talk:Jurta|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jurta|contribs]]) 20:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:Boa|Boa]] ([[User talk:Boa|talk]]) 20:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# I agree, many of the post-GA builds of Vibranium and Cobalt are nothing more but security updates and quality updates that fix bugs and security issues and they clog up the build lists for those pages. It only makes since to cover post-GA builds that have actual notable changes like the ones listed above. WindowsGuy2021, 3:59, 12 May 2022<br />
# I'm pretty sure I have proposed long time ago that any Update RTM builds wouldn't be allowed here (aside from service pack betas and build 6003). Many if not all of these pages deserve to go, otherwise it'd be cluttered with over thousands of pages of Update RTM builds. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 01:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 11:31, 13 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:Kendrenogen|Kendrenogen]] ([[User talk:Kendrenogen|talk]]) 16:30, 13 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== Purging of cumulative updates of betas (Only for Manganese and up) ==<br />
<br />
I think we should purge all of the cumulative updates of betas in post-20H1 Dev Channel as they do not contain any useful content as well as notable changes.<br />
I meant all builds with these labs without notable changes:<br />
* '''rs_prerelease_flt'''<br />
* '''fe_release_svc_prod(1-3)'''<br />
* '''fe_release_svc_im'''<br />
* '''co_release_svc_prod(1-3)'''<br />
* '''co_release_svc_im'''<br />
* '''ni_release_svc_prod(1-2)'''<br />
This proposal excludes all builds from 22000.51 to 22000.184.<br />
{{Unsigned|94.121.83.99}}<br />
<br />
To make things clear, this proposal just includes all updated builds that do not have notable stuff. Of course, we need base builds like 22000.1 or 22621.1. Also I'm going to make the limit of proposal even smaller. It won't include updated builds if they're shared unofficially/illegally. Like 22000.9. Also unleaked updated builds won't be included. I don't think I can make this limit even smaller. {{Unsigned|94.120.198.166}}<br />
:That is odd. 22572, 22581, 22598, 22616, 22621 has .100 / .200 or .1000 after the build number. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:301C:DDD9:33D:5E67|2001:F90:40C0:A072:301C:DDD9:33D:5E67]] 00:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
::That's completely '''false'''. These builds are late Insider builds. Late Inider builds, GA Escrow and later (<code>?(development semester)_release</code>)always have the minor build number .1 (.0 for early Windows 10 feature updates) if no update is installed. If an update is installed, the minor build number will jump, but the major one will left intact (excludes 22622 because it is basically a fork of 22621 cumulative updates with new feature rolling out). For early Insider builds (<code>rs_prerelease</code>), the minor version number usually fall between 1000-1002. Same as above, if an update is installed, the minor one will jump (1000 -> 1010, 1001 -> 1011 and 1002 -> 1012, I think) and the major one will remain unchanged. For late Insiders builds on GitHub (minor = 1000/1001), I think they come from a special, internal branch. [[User:Someone|Someone]] ([[User talk:Someone|talk]]) 03:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
::: 1004 also. 10240, 10586, 14393, 17134 based [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:9CBA:700B:C41:D6F4|2001:F90:40C0:A072:9CBA:700B:C41:D6F4]] 07:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
#I think it wasn't. So 22621 just based a OS later then May. [[Special:Contributions/2001:f90:40c0:a072:9aa:460c:a255:8787|2001:f90:40c0:a072:9aa:460c:a255:8787]] 19:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC+08:00)<br />
#I wouldn't say all. Take [[Windows 11 build 22581.100|22581.100]] for example. This "service pipeline" reintroduces tabbed [[File Explorer]]. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 11:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#: These can be excluded from this proposal. But rest of them doesn't seem that useful. {{Unsigned|94.121.83.99}}<br />
#: I'll take 22621.160 as example. It introduced tabs and revamped navigation pane, But, its earlier CU, 22621.(2-4), and it's later CU, 22621.105, does nothing. [[User:Someone|Someone]], 10:01, 28 June 2022<br />
#:: Then, 22621.160 is fine. But shouldn't 22621.(2-4) or at least 22621.105 be purged since there aren't any notable changes or features? {{Unsigned|94.123.156.175}}<br />
#::: Then take 22621.1 as example. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:187A:BD42:911F:1CCA|2001:F90:40C0:A072:187A:BD42:911F:1CCA]] 03:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:::: Base builds still need to be included. Just like 22000.1.[[User:Someone|Someone ]] ([[User talk:Someone|talk]]) 09:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#::::: Take 22598, 22610, 22621 as expmple. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:8970:5C27:12FD:4A2F|2001:F90:40C0:A072:8970:5C27:12FD:4A2F]] 02:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:::::: Didn't you read my comment above? These build is a full build, not an upgrade [[User:Someone|Someone]] ([[User talk:Someone|talk]]) 03:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Restore Windows 11 build 22000.346 page ==<br />
{{Cpd close}}<br><br />
Restored as requested. - [[User:Pivotman319|pivotman319]] ([[User_talk:Pivotman319|📫]]) 14:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I don't understand why the page for build 22000.346 was removed as a part of getting rid of post-GA update pages. It actually had some notable changes, including the redesigned fluent emojis and changes to the BSOD color. Some of the pages that had fewer changes were actually kept, such as 22000.282 (which only contained minor tweaks and adjustments) and 22000.526 (only added Microsoft Account page in Settings). Considering that these two post-GA updates were kept, I think 22000.346 should stay too. [[User:Charka123|Charka123]] ([[User talk:Charka123|talk]]) 20:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah, at least unleaked post-GA updates should stay. {{Unsigned|94.121.83.99}}<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== Move all the images ==<br />
I think every image only this '''example''' was best:<br />
*File:'''Windows10-6.4.9850-Metro'''.png<br />
<br />
Use this example to move all images. Please everyone do it. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:6840:4743:E02B:B5F0|2001:F90:40C0:A072:6840:4743:E02B:B5F0]] 06:23, 19 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
:Why move these images? [[Special:Contributions/88.228.248.220|88.228.248.220]] 01:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
::Too much users created file by using this example. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:10D6:7825:C69E:30F7|2001:F90:40C0:A072:10D6:7825:C69E:30F7]] 05:47, 20 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
:No, don't. There is no naming scheme for files and I don't see any point in introducing one. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 10:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Make a document about the 23H2 builds (archive) ==<br />
{{Cpd close}}<br />
Closed at 11 August 2022. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:8970:5C27:12FD:4A2F|2001:F90:40C0:A072:8970:5C27:12FD:4A2F]] 02:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
If [[Copper]] released a build then the [[Windows 11, version 23H2|23H2 page]] doesn't have that build. So, if make a document, it will be easier. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:6840:4743:E02B:B5F0|2001:F90:40C0:A072:6840:4743:E02B:B5F0]] 06:32, 19 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
: I agreed. It should have some builds. They can just avoid server builds and show client builds [[user:someone|Someone]] ([[User talk:Someone|talk]]) 10:09, 28 June 2022<br />
:: That was odd lol [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:6840:4743:E02B:B5F0|2001:F90:40C0:A072:6840:4743:E02B:B5F0]] 11:03, 29 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== Move these pages. ==<br />
=== First move ===<br />
There are 2 windows 2000 builds it was not moved. This is the list of not moved Windows 2000 builds:<br />
*{{BLItem Confirmed|Windows 2000 build 1781.1|1781.1}}<br />
*{{BLItem Confirmed|Windows 2000 build 1794.1|1794.1}}<br />
[[Special:Contributions/2001:f90:40c0:a072:5189:e019:ae56:b207|2001:f90:40c0:a072:5189:e019:ae56:b207]] 18:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC+08:00)<br />
:Could you also move [[Windows Live Messenger build 14.0.3921]] to [[Windows Live Messenger 2009 build 3921]]? The page already exists, but it is a redirect. - [[Special:Contributions/212.23.130.206|212.23.130.206]] <sup>([[User talk:212.23.130.206|talk]])</sup> 13:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
::{{done}} --[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 11:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
=== Second move ===<br />
Please, move this page.<br />
*{{BLItem Unconfirmed|Windows NT 4.0 build 1124.1|1124.1}}'''(ATTEMPT: Move this page to [[Windows NT 4.0 build 1124]]. In this attempt you must move before 08:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC).)''' [[Special:Contributions/2001:f90:40c0:a072:2193:ed23:ccfd:7a64|2001:f90:40c0:a072:2193:ed23:ccfd:7a64]] 16:53, 14 May 2022 (UTC+08:00)<br />
:And what would happen if we didn't? Seems dumb to set a deadline for a simple move [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 11:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
::If didn't moved before that time, I will give last 5 days time for you. [[Special:Contributions/2001:f90:40c0:a072:f805:cd7:28b:ff74|2001:f90:40c0:a072:2193:ed23:ccfd:7a64]] 12:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC+08:00)<br />
:::{{done|DONE.}} --[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 01:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Third move ===<br />
There is 1 page and 2 files need to moved.<br />
<br />
'''Pages (Only [[User:Xeno|Xeno]])'''<br />
#[[Microsoft Office XP build 2511 (RC)]] -> [[Microsoft Office XP build 2511]]<br />
<br />
'''Files (Only [[User:HawHoo|HawHoo]])'''<br />
#[[:File:VirtualBox Windows 2000 20 12 2021 19 35 29.png]] -> [[:File:2511 WordAbout.png]]<br />
#[[:File:VirtualBox Windows 2000 20 12 2021 19 18 34.png]] -> [[:File:2202 WordAbout.png]] [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:6CDB:CDDB:CC9E:D0CF|2001:F90:40C0:A072:6CDB:CDDB:CC9E:D0CF]] 04:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:{{done|''Done''.}} [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 06:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Will Windows 10, version 22H2 come out? ==<br />
{{Cpd close}}<br />
Now Microsoft has been released Windows 10 build 19044.1806, WAIT? Why there is Windows 10, version 22H2? Will it come out? [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:500D:1A9D:213C:68F7|2001:F90:40C0:A072:500D:1A9D:213C:68F7]] 04:05, 25 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
: It has been confirmed, but the page for it isn't created yet. [[User:someone|Someone]] ([[User talk:someone|talk]]) 10:15 28 June 2022<br />
:: Those pages were created. [[User:Faynti|Faynti]] ([[User talk:Faynti|talk]]) 20:56 3 July 2022<br />
::: Windows 10, version 22H2 available in Release Preview channel :) [[User:Axolotel1320|Axolotel1320]] ([[User talk:Axolotel1320|talk]]) 13:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== i386, IA-32, ia32 or x86? x64, x86-64, x86_64, AMD64 or amd64? ==<br />
<br />
I do not know what to use. 16:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC) {{Unsigned|88.67.248.152}}<br />
<br />
:x86 and x64. By the way, I'd suggest signing your comments with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>. - [[User:Pivotman319|pivotman319]] ([[User_talk:Pivotman319|📫]]) 16:51, 26 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
:The general guideline is to call it however the OS calls it. There is no explicit standard on that (yet). --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 17:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
::It was I386, x86, AMD64, x64, x86_64, ARM64, IA-64, 68k.[[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:5061:2F54:E04D:CC34|2001:F90:40C0:A072:5061:2F54:E04D:CC34]] 23:43, 26 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
:::So x86, IA-64 and x64 for Windows and i386, ia64 and amd64 for Linux? And, thanks for the tip, it was very hard to put in signs manually. [[Special:Contributions/88.67.248.152|88.67.248.152]] 15:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== ViVeTool 0.3+ related syntax ==<br />
<br />
Well, I forget to discuss this first before... May we can change the older <code>vivetool addconfig [velocity_id]</code> code (from version until 0.2) with <code>/enable /id:[velocity_id]</code> code (from version 0.3+)?<br />
I need to know, if we can keep it for compability reason or change it to better experience. 😸 Hi. I'm [[User:NekoSam395|NekoSam395.]] ([[User talk:NekoSam395|💬]] | [[Special:Contributions/NekoSam395|👨💻]]) 15:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
:I've also mentioned this on the Discord. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 15:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
::I'm sorry but I currently not using Discord a while, until a few weeks. All the decision is under the admins for now. :) 😸 Hi. I'm [[User:NekoSam395|NekoSam395.]] ([[User talk:NekoSam395|💬]] | [[Special:Contributions/NekoSam395|👨💻]]) 15:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
:I would just mention the feature IDs itself and leave out the ViVeTool specific bits. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 11:57, 29 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
::Agreed. That's nice idea. 😸 Hi. I'm [[User:NekoSam395|NekoSam395.]] ([[User talk:NekoSam395|💬]] | [[Special:Contributions/NekoSam395|👨💻]]) 20:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== It is 15 hours when 7985 was shared ==<br />
{{Cpd close}}<br />
Created [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:A459:8FCB:27F:AEBD|2001:F90:40C0:A072:A459:8FCB:27F:AEBD]] 01:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
It was to be 15 hours when [[Windows 8 build 7985]] shared to BetaWiki discord. Why this page was not created? [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:A459:8FCB:27F:AEBD|2001:F90:40C0:A072:A459:8FCB:27F:AEBD]] 10:56, 29 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== Merge Service Pipeline updates with their respective build pages. ==<br />
<br />
Windows Insider Service Pipeline updates aren't notable enough to create a new page every time one is released. It'd be better if there was a note on the build's page and would reduce the need to upload a winver image for every pipeline. An example would be [[Windows 11 build 25151.1010|build 25151]] merged with [[Windows 11 build 25151.1000|build 25151.1000]] [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 18:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
#[[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 18:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#😸 Hi. I'm [[User:NekoSam395|NekoSam395.]] ([[User talk:NekoSam395|💬]] | [[Special:Contributions/NekoSam395|👨💻]]) 20:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
# Agreed to this on Discord already. Most of these are irrelevant and the "changes" they contain only stem from feature configurations for different branches. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 13:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
# Other minor pre-release build updates don't have their own pages (except special cases like 8102 which was preinstalled), so these also shouldn't. [[Special:Contributions/89.241.109.169|89.241.109.169]] 13:46, 2 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:HawHoo|HawHoo]] ([[User talk:HawHoo|talk]]) 18:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 03:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#Agreed, you can see my sandbox: [[User:Someone/Sandbox/1/1.1]] [[User:Someone|Someone]] ([[User talk:Someone|talk]]) 11:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
#I didn't agree to did this. Even some builds (From Cobalt) orof Windows 10 have changes bugs [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:E594:60B8:55A2:CDD7|2001:F90:40C0:A072:E594:60B8:55A2:CDD7]] 12:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:What? --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 13:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#::21390.2025 did not. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:95C:7040:50FC:DCCB|2001:F90:40C0:A072:95C:7040:50FC:DCCB]] 07:51, 13 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Maybe 17713 (rs_prerelease) is october 2018 build? ==<br />
<br />
Just like: 18980.1000.rs_prerelease.190907-1312 is compiled after 18980.1.vb_release.190907-1301, not build of 1903? {{Unsigned|Faynti}}<br />
:No. The <code>rs_prerelease</code> is use for Dev Channels or Insider Previews; <code>xx_release</code> is for Later Insider previews and GA. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9|2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9]] 07:47,13p July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Are those builds notable? ==<br />
<br />
They don't include nothing new. The enablement which installed, will update itself to the same version, if you installed a CU that compatible with [[Windows 10 May 2020 Update|19041]].<br />
<br />
Deleting pages will affect: <br />
<br />
[[Windows 10 build 19043.789|19043.789.vb_release_svc_prod3.210129-1243]]<br />
<br />
[[Windows 10 build 19044.1023|19044.1023.vb_release_svc_prod3.210517-1726]]<br />
<br />
[[Windows 10 build 19044.1052|19044.1052.vb_release_svc_prod1.210604-1652]]<br />
<br />
[[Windows 10 build 19044.1055|19044.1055.vb_release_svc_im.210609-2133]]<br />
<br />
[[Windows 10 build 19044.1081|19044.1081.vb_release_svc_prod3.210607-1924]]<br />
<br />
[[Windows 10 build 19044.1082|19044.1082.vb_release_svc_prod3.210624-2043]]<br />
<br />
[[Windows 10 build 19044.1083|19044.1083.vb_release_svc_prod3.210703-0820]]<br />
<br />
[[Windows 10 build 19044.1110|19044.1110.vb_release_svc_prod1.210708-1509]]<br />
<br />
Are you agree with me? if you agree, i will start the AFD. - [[User:Faynti|Faynti]] - 8:58 05-07-2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
# Those update builds are not notable since those builds didn't include anything new, apart from the build number change. [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 09:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:Faynti|Faynti]] ([[User talk:Faynti|talk]]) 09:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
<br />
== Mobile web fault error ==<br />
{{Cpd close}}<br />
:Fixed [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9|2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9]] 04:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
OS: iOS 10.3.4 (14G61)<br><br />
System: iPad 4<br><br />
Model: MD5113LL/A<br><br />
Bug: Can`t edit without vandlilsm abuse (Block), when i answer the question it says "Wrong code, try again." without wrong answers. i tried to use Google Chrome app (version 71.0.3578.89), Microsoft Edge (version 46.3.30), it also didnt work. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9|2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9]] 02:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
:It is not recommended to share your iPad's serial number with everyone. Remember, your iPad's serial number is your own and private info. [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 04:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:I thought BetaWiki is not available aa a mobile app. Anyway, try to edit with the desktop version of this page. - [[Special:Contributions/2.204.222.238|2.204.222.238]] 07:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
::That IP thought BetaWiki has a mobile app that can be used to read and edit pages, even though the IP is just visiting the mobile version of the site. BetaWiki does not have a mobile app! [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 08:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
::This sentence (That IP thought BetaWiki has a mobile app that can be used to read and edit pages) was false. I didnt use a mobile app to edit pages. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9|2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9]] 01:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
:::That sentence was true. I know you didn't use a mobile app, but it seems that you didn't read the sentence correctly. I said "BetaWiki has a mobile app" in the sentence, not "That IP is using a mobile app". Also, hiding your iPad's serial number from the reading view just doesn't make sense, because the serial number is still visible when editing the source of this page. [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 03:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
:You're probably being ratelimited by the wiki. That's intended behavior. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 09:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== Mobile web fault #2 ==<br />
OS: iOS 1 to 16.0 beta 7<br><br />
System: All<br><br />
Model: All of them<br><br />
Bug: "Sorry for the mess!" After JaGoTu upgraded MediaWiki version to 1.3.7, on the mobile web the Contributions page was broken. After this version released, this error is still on the mobile version of BetaWiki (Safari). I reported that before, it still have no message.[[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9|2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9]] 03:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
:Try using a different browser (if it is supporting iOS 10) or a different machine with a more up-to-date browser. - [[Special:Contributions/188.57.51.189|188.57.51.189]] 11:47, 23 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
::I tried try Google 71.0 it also did not work. [[Special:Contributions/60.246.37.16|60.246.37.16]] 09:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
::UPDATE: iOS 15.6 also won’t work. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:7401:3302:E492:48E2|2001:F90:40C0:A072:7401:3302:E492:48E2]] 09:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Do the automatic Sandbox cleaning ==<br />
<br />
All stuff (except of that Sandbox header) in global BetaWiki Sandbox must be removed once page refreshed. Agree? [[User:Axolotel1320|Axolotel1320]] ([[User talk:Axolotel1320|talk]]) 08:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Move Insider service pipeline updates to their respective build pages. ==<br />
<br />
With the high amount of service pipeline updates in the Insider Program, I feel like it would be better to mention these updates on the update's respective OS page rather than have a separate page due to how non-notable the pipeline updates tend to be. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 17:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==== Support ====<br />
#[[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 17:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Hanhan188|Hanhan188]] ([[User talk:Hanhan188|talk]]) 0:56, 23 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:WindowsGuy2021|WindowsGuy2021]] 8:44, 22 July 2022<br />
#[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 07:24, 23 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#There is too much builds with the service pipelines builds. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:A15D:BFA4:F892:27E3|2001:F90:40C0:A072:A15D:BFA4:F892:27E3]] 10:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#I mean that's what we did with other updates too. Makes sense to me. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 10:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#Just like you did with [[Windows 8 build 8102.0 (winmain win8m3)]]. - [[Special:Contributions/188.57.51.189|188.57.51.189]] 11:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#See my sandbox: https://betawiki.net/wiki/User:Someone/Sandbox/1/1.1?venotify=created [[User:Someone|Someone]] ([[User talk:Someone|talk]]) 05:31, 3 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:I think we can skip adding images for these updates as there's no notable changes. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 11:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#Skip it just [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:6932:F2B1:963E:3AA3|2001:F90:40C0:A072:6932:F2B1:963E:3AA3]] 11:57, 4 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==== Oppose ====<br />
<br />
== Can you update an image? ==<br />
I want you to resize the macos Monterey light mode desktop image! {{Unsigned|184.98.73.201}} [[File:MacOS-12.0-Monterey-Desktop.png|alt=Small macos Monterey desktop image, use simpleimageresizer.com to resize it to 1254x952 or something near that|thumb|''I'm not logged in so I can't upload the resized image, it should be resized to 1254x952, I used'' '''https://www.simpleimageresizer.com/''' ''to resize'' to something near dat]]<br />
:1254x952 is not the correct size try 1280x720<br />
*Also change those files: <br />
#[[:File:10a219.jpeg]] (293x360 -> 976x1200)<br />
#[[:File:7989charmsettings.png]], [[:File:7989charm.png]], [[:File:7989charm2.png]] (Change this to normal mode) [[Special:Contributions/60.246.37.16|60.246.37.16]] 10:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Remember, upscaling an image is against the guidelines. [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 07:15, 31 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Windows 7 - Aero on Classic? ==<br />
<br />
My PC theme isnt right. The classic theme has aero on it? The Start Menu and clock was still aero. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:D81B:AE81:10B2:8B25|2001:F90:40C0:A072:D81B:AE81:10B2:8B25]] 01:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
:If your theme services is broken, you probably got this [[User:Someone|Someone]] ([[User talk:Someone|talk]]) 16:25, 18 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
::When I changed back Classic to Aero the taskbar brokens, if I restart, it fixed [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:7997:3159:9CE9:853E|2001:F90:40C0:A072:7997:3159:9CE9:853E]] 00:38, 24 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Want to add image ==<br />
<br />
Hi, I want to add the image of the new Control Panel from my PC to the Windows 11 build 22622.586 gallery. How do I do it? {{Unsigned|ConDrv}}<br />
<br />
: https://betawiki.net/index.php?title=Special:Upload [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:F0BB:6989:5D73:103|2001:F90:40C0:A072:F0BB:6989:5D73:103]] 01:22, 25 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:You need to contribute 10 edits to the wiki to be able to upload images, which you seemingly don't have [[User:Orbitron|Orbitron]] ([[User talk:Orbitron|talk]]) 01:23, 25 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
: It basically gives you the autoconfirmed status - [[User:Someone|Someone]] ([[User talk:Someone|talk]]) 15:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Any way to access the original Watercolor theme used on this site? ==<br />
<br />
Hey all. I like the Watercolor theme used on this wiki, and I'd like to use it on other wikis. Sadly, I couldn't find the original CSS for the theme, where can I find it? --[[Special:Contributions/188.58.94.198|188.58.94.198]] 19:11, 25 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
:https://github.com/betawiki-net/watercolor --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 19:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Windows 8 build 8377: What the... ==<br />
Every WinJS should has ui.js, base.js and ui-light.js. Why there is no links on 8377's? Also why this: <br />
<br />
*'''8377 ui.js'''<br />
<pre><br />
/// <loc filename="Metadata\ui_loc_oam.xml" format="messagebundle" /><br />
/*!<br />
© Microsoft. All rights reserved.<br />
<br />
This library is supported for use in Windows Metro style apps only.<br />
<br />
Build: 1.0.8377.0.winmain_win8rc.120507-1903<br />
<br />
Version: Microsoft.WinJS.1.0.RC<br />
*/<br />
/// <reference path="ms-appx://Microsoft.WinJS.1.0.RC/js/base.js" /><br />
/// <reference path="ms-appx://Microsoft.WinJS.1.0.RC/js/ui.js" /><br />
</pre><br />
* '''8508 base.js'''<br />
<syntaxhighlight lang="javascript"><br />
/*!<br />
© Microsoft. All rights reserved.<br />
<br />
This library is supported for use in Windows Store apps only.<br />
<br />
Build: 1.0.8508.0.win8_rtm.120703-1900<br />
<br />
Version: Microsoft.WinJS.1.0<br />
*/<br />
</syntaxhighlight> [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94|2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94]] 23:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)</div>
2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94
https://betawiki.net/index.php?title=Windows_3.00a&diff=229809
Windows 3.00a
2022-08-29T10:53:51Z
<p>2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{Confuse|Windows 3.0A}}<br />
{{Infobox Windows build<br />
|build of = [[Windows 3.0]]<br />
|buildtag = 3.00a<br />
|arch = x86 (PC, Intel Inboard 386/PC)<br />
|image = Windows30-RTM-Desktop.png<br />
|winver = Win30aabout.png<br />
|rivals = {{Rivals|TCB=https://thecollectionbook.info/builds/windows/build/29|TCBGallery=https://www.thecollectionbook.info/gallery/?f=/windows/16-bit%20kernel/windows%203.0/3.0a/english}}<br />
}}<br />
'''Windows 3.00a''' was a minor update to [[Windows 3.00]], which was released on 31 October 1990. It fixed a few bugs from the earlier release. [[Windows 3.0 with Multimedia Extensions 1.0|Multimedia Edition]] is based on this version. Due to some changes introduced with bug fixes, Microsoft Virtual PC 2004/2007 users must include the line <code>EMMExclude=A000-CBFF</code> in <code>SYSTEM.INI</code>'s <code>[386Enh]</code> section.<br />
<br />
A version of this build for the Intel Inboard 386/PC (an ISA card with a 386, 387 socket and some RAM intended for earlier systems), from 14 January 1991, was dumped by BitHistory on 16 September 2020 and uploaded to the Internet Archive on 4 December 2020.<ref>https://archive.org/details/intelwindowsv30fortheintelinboard386pc</ref><br />
<br />
Unilike the original English release, the Spanish version has a copyright date of 1991, suggesting that it was released later.<br />
<br />
== Gallery ==<br />
<gallery><br />
Win30asetup1.png|Loading GUI setup<br />
Win30asetup9.png|Copying files<br />
Win30asetup11.png|Disk 3<br />
Win30asetup12.png|Copying files<br />
Win30asetup13.png|Disk 4<br />
Win30asetup14.png|Copying files<br />
Win30asetup15.png|Ditto<br />
Win30asetup16.png|Disk 3<br />
Win30asetup17.png|Copying files<br />
Win30asetup18.png|Confirmation to modify AUTOEXEC.BAT and CONFIG.SYS<br />
Win30asetup19.png|Ditto<br />
Win30asetup20.png|Printers<br />
Win30asetup21.png|Set Up Applications<br />
Win30asetup22.png|Scanning<br />
Win30asetup23.png|Select Applications<br />
Win30asetup24.png|Release notes<br />
Win30asetup25.png|End<br />
Win30rc6boot.png|Boot screen<br />
Win30afb.png|First boot<br />
Win30acal.png|Calendar<br />
Win30acalc.png|Calculator<br />
Win30acardfile.png|Cardfile<br />
Win30aclip.png|Clipboard<br />
Win30aclock.png|Clock<br />
Win30afm.png|File Manager<br />
Win30anotepad.png|Notepad<br />
Win30apaintbrush.png|Paintbrush<br />
Win30apif.png|PIF Editor<br />
Win30apm.png|Print Manager without a printer plugged in<br />
Win30are.png|Reversi<br />
Win30areadme.png|README.TXT<br />
Win30arecorder.png|Recorder<br />
Win30asol.png|Solitaire<br />
Win30aterminal1.png|Select default serial port<br />
Win30aterminal2.png|Terminal<br />
Win30awrite.png|Write<br />
Win30aws.png|Windows Setup<br />
Win30aes.png|End session<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
== References ==<br />
<references/><br />
<br />
[[Category:Windows 3.0 builds]]</div>
2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94
https://betawiki.net/index.php?title=Windows_8.1_build_9319_(fbl_partner_out10)&diff=229808
Windows 8.1 build 9319 (fbl partner out10)
2022-08-29T10:52:33Z
<p>2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94: /* External links */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Infobox Windows build<br />
|build of = [[Windows 8.1]]<br />
|image = 9319_1.jpg<br />
|buildtag = 6.3.9319.0.winmain.130208-1820<br />
|arch = x86<br />
|sku = Pro<br />
|compiled = 2013-02-08<br />
|timebomb = 2014-01-16<br />
|winver = 9319winver.png<br />
}}<br />
<br />
'''Windows 8.1 build 9319''' is a build of [[Windows 8.1]]. It was mentioned before any Windows 8.1 builds or releases, but it was later confirmed by WinJS using the proper Windows Store GUID on 14 December 2013 by JaGoTu. Several screenshots of this build were also shared by the Chinese website Win8China. This is the earliest known build to update the kernel version to 6.3.<br />
<br />
== Gallery ==<br />
<gallery><br />
9319_2.jpg|[[Internet Explorer 11]]<br />
9319_3.PNG|Demo<br />
9319.png|WinJS listing<br />
</gallery><br />
<br />
== External links ==<br />
* [https://wscont.apps.microsoft.com/winstore/a43f8337-2b31-4735-a006-9328167c3098/6.3/728/WinJS/3/base.js base.js]<br />
* [https://wscont.apps.microsoft.com/winstore/a43f8337-2b31-4735-a006-9328167c3098/6.3/728/WinJS/3/ui.js ui.js]<br />
* [https://wscont.apps.microsoft.com/winstore/a43f8337-2b31-4735-a006-9328167c3098/6.3/728/WinJS/3/ui-light.css ui-light.css]<br />
* [http://www.win8china.com/html/4179.html "Windows Blue ≈ Win8 SP1 ≠ Win9"] @ [http://www.win8china.com/ ''Win8China.com'']<br />
* [http://www.win8china.com/html/4181.html "IE11 惊现 Windows Blue 中"] @ [http://www.win8china.com/ ''Win8China.com'']<br />
<br />
[[Category:Windows 8.1 builds]]<br />
[[Category:Unleaked builds]]</div>
2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94
https://betawiki.net/index.php?title=Windows_8.1_build_9490&diff=229807
Windows 8.1 build 9490
2022-08-29T10:49:51Z
<p>2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{Infobox Windows build<br />
|build of = [[Windows 8.1]]<br />
|buildtag = 6.3.9490<br />
}}<br />
<br />
'''Windows 8.1 build 9490''' is an unleaked build of [[Windows 8.1]]. This build is mentioned in a KB article "How to disable the "Test mode" message that is displayed in Windows". <ref>[https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2509241/how-to-disable-the-test-mode-message-that-is-displayed-in-windows How to disable the "Test mode" message that is displayed in Windows]</ref><br />
<br />
<pre><br />
Test mode Windows 8.1 build 9490<br />
</pre><br />
<br />
== References ==<br />
<references /><br />
[[Category:Windows 8.1 builds]]<br />
[[Category:Unleaked builds]]</div>
2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94
https://betawiki.net/index.php?title=BetaWiki:Articles_for_deletion&diff=229806
BetaWiki:Articles for deletion
2022-08-29T10:45:56Z
<p>2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94: /* Support */</p>
<hr />
<div>__NEWSECTIONLINK__<br />
'''Articles for deletion''' ('''AfD''') is the place where we discuss whether an article should be deleted.<br />
<br />
To nominate an article for deletion, add the <code>{{tl|Delete}}</code> template to the top of the article and add a new section below this lead section explaining your rationale.<br />
<br />
{{archives}}<br />
{{TOC|clear=left|limit=2}}<br />
<br />
== Windows 10 build [[Windows 10 build 14389|14389]] and [[Windows 10 build 14321|14321]], [[Windows 8 build 7992 (fbl_uex_icp)]], Windows Vista build [[Windows Vista build 5089|5089]], [[Windows Vista build 5353|5353]] and [[Windows Vista build 5708|5708]] ==<br />
{{Afd close}}<br />
Build 7992 already QD'd for recreation of a previously deleted page. Builds 5353, 5708, and 14389 deleted. Builds 5089 and 14321 kept. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 02:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
There're both only one screenshot about it.And there are no links about them.I think there're PS. {{unsigned|Hanhan188}}<br />
:They are not PS. But these builds was on a different source! [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:6CDB:CDDB:CC9E:D0CF|2001:F90:40C0:A072:6CDB:CDDB:CC9E:D0CF]] 08:57, 21 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===Support===<br />
#I asked about this on the Discord a few months ago and no one gave me a source. As mentioned, 14321 possibly comes from a Channel 9 video (RIP channel 9) so that should be kept [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 12:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
#I would spare 14321 as that one seems to come from a Channel 9 video and perhaps 5089, but the rest doesn't really seem notable. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 16:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
#The only one that I was able to find a source for was 5708, which is [https://www.betaarchive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22925 this BetaArchive forum post]. However, there are replies to said post which call out some of the screenshots for being fake, so 5708 might still be up for deletion. I wasn't able to find any other sources for the other builds, but like Ryuzaki said, 14321 might originate from a Channel 9 video. [[User:Jurta|Jurta]] ([[User talk:Jurta|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jurta|contribs]]) 08:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#5708's picture is literally scribbled on with a brush in MS Paint, plus not many sources, so yep, I think I think it should be deleted. Correct me if I'm wrong. [[Special:Contributions/2402:800:6105:4717:842D:B9B:F0C8:41E0|2402:800:6105:4717:842D:B9B:F0C8:41E0]] 04:09, 14 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#That wasn't a problem for 5708. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:6CDB:CDDB:CC9E:D0CF|2001:F90:40C0:A072:6CDB:CDDB:CC9E:D0CF]] 08:57, 21 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
# Delete. --[[Special:Contributions/105.111.118.75|105.111.118.75]] 16:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# For builds 14389, 5353, and 5708. I still would like a source for 5353. For 5708, it originates from the BetaArchive thread above, but still rather dubious. Not sure where the 14389 came from. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 02:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#: To actually add on to 14321, that build is very likely a fake. Build 14301 (rs1 shell cortana) got deleted lately for "Completely bogus fake, as RS1 main doesn't even have the MS confidential watermark since it got axed. See [[Windows 10 build 14278.0]]". Needless to say if 14278 already got rid of the watermark, then 14321 shouldn't even have it. Hiding the buildlab makes this even more suspicious. Clear fake. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 02:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
# For build 14389. [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 12:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===Oppose===<br />
#Just because there is one unconfirmed screenshot doesn’t mean the build isn’t noteable. [[User:Orangera1n|Orangera1n]] ([[User talk:Orangera1n|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Orangera1n|edits]]) 11:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
#: It quite literally does. Screenshots that can't be traced back to the original source are not proper sources to make a build notable. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 16:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
#::BetaWiki has confirmed builds, same as unconfirmed. So it didnt 100% build is leaked. <s>Just delete 5708</s> {{Unsigned|2001:f90:40c0:c165:edd6:91dd:8f58:a85d}}<br />
#:::"Unconfirmed" means that the build was not confirmed by official sources. Notability guidelines still apply to these. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 14:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:DomesticConsumer|Chrmmice]] ([[User talk:DomesticConsumer|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/DomesticConsumer|edits]]) 13:06, 9 April 2022 (UTC)<br />
#Even if they are just single screenshots, another factor that should be taken into consideration is if they match the timeframe for when they were compiled. To name a couple, 5353 appears to have been captured off a projector from a private demonstration event, which isn't unusual for these kinds of builds (e.g. 2415 of Whistler was also displayed on a projector screen). As for 5708, drawing edits aside, the JPEG artifacts and system tray icons give indication this was used by an internal tester and they simply decided to put this on their personal account(s)/website of sorts, which may or may not have any archived captures floating around. The "no notifications" marking also gives the impression this was meant to be used to report a bug in said build. Granted, even back then these could've easily been doctored in such ways to fool others, but as long as no continuity errors are visibly spotted, that opens up more room for debate whether these are legitimate or not, regardless of if sources can be traced back or not. My first suggestion to this would be to ask the users who created these articles about where they found out about these screenshots, as they'd probably still know. If they don't seem to recall, then that would put the builds more into questioning territory. --[[User:Blue Horizon|Blue Horizon]] ([[User talk:Blue Horizon|talk]]) 23:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:[[Aero#Post-reset|That build 5089]] was shown in the "Aero" page. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:500D:1A9D:213C:68F7|2001:F90:40C0:A072:500D:1A9D:213C:68F7]] 03:28, 25 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
# For builds 14321 (likely from Channel 9) and 5089. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 02:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
# For builds mentioned in the header. The page for build 7992 (fbl_uex_icp) has been deleted. [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 12:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== [[OS/2 Warp 5]] ==<br />
{{Afd close}}<br />
Deleted on 11 May 2022. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 22:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
This version is probably a fake and there's no source I can find to back up that this version was under development at the time. Not even sources like OS/2 Museum lists information regarding this "version". The closest I could find to information regarding to this version is [http://www.os2ezine.com/v2n3/rumour.htm this], which needless to say is fan rumors. Other sources regarding to Warp 5 refers it simply as [[eComStation]] or ArcaOS. Safe to say that this version is very likely a fake, and if it isn't, then there's no source I could find that can back it up as real. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 03:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
#[[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 11:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 14:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#Sources that I could find that mention OS/2 Warp 5 are just speculation and don't really prove its authenticity, I doubt IBM ever started development on this version. [[User:Jurta|Jurta]] ([[User talk:Jurta|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jurta|contribs]]) 08:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#Warp 5 just feels out of place in the timeline for having a scheduled release at a time when Windows was cornering the entire operating system market share, which had been widely the case ever since Windows 95 made a big splash in the technology scene. By 2005 when Windows Vista's final branding was announced and Windows XP was closing in on its peak in usage next year, most people saw OS/2 as a relic of the past, and it probably didn't make sense to IBM to release, let alone create a new version since they know it would only be a small niche of users interested in it. --[[User:Blue Horizon|Blue Horizon]] ([[User talk:Blue Horizon|talk]]) 23:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# I can still found some links about this version and i founded a crazy thing of the OS/2 Warp 5. (lol) [https://meet-windows-me.fandom.com/wiki/OS/2_Warp_5 link] [[Special:Contributions/2001:f90:40c0:a072:a1f9:79d4:a984:4029|2001:f90:40c0:a072:a1f9:79d4:a984:4029]] 13:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC+08:00)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== [[Windows 10 build 10240.16425]] ==<br />
{{Afd close}}<br />
:Page (and respective images) deleted. I don't believe a post-RTM GDR build that has no significant changes over the base build is really worth noting here. - [[User:Pivotman319|pivotman319]] ([[User_talk:Pivotman319|📫]]) 12:48, 17 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
This page was already QD'd although it doesn't really meet the criteria for that in my view. Either way it's still only an updated version of the RTM, so I don't think it actually belongs here. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 08:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
=== Support ===<br />
# Per above. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 08:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:Caveria|Caveria]] ([[User talk:Caveria|talk]]) 08:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# While I stand corrected in the update situation, it's still a non-noteworthy build. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 09:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
#MEGA DL Link: https://mega.nz/folder/DYgCELaa#UiHQTeb2fiAKuBeqpsLPpQ [[User:BlueRain|BlueRain]] ([[User talk:BlueRain|talk]]) 10:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:I don't see how having a download to the build changes how noteworthy it is. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 10:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#::Some file for this link, the version was some 10240.16425 but even have some 10240.'''16430'''. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:F805:CD7:28B:FF74|2001:F90:40C0:A072:F805:CD7:28B:FF74]] 12:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC+08:00)<br />
</div><br />
== [[Windows 10 build 15035/styles.css]] ==<br />
{{Afd close}}<br />
Rejected; page will be kept. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 17:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
<br />
This CSS is nothing useful and not even used. --[[Special:Contributions/105.111.118.75|105.111.118.75]] 16:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
# It's used for the table. So, yeah no. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 10:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 08:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 17:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== Pages that reference the Terminal repo on GitHub ==<br />
<br />
I feel that pages that reference the Terminal repo on GitHub should be removed most pages only reference a build number with no mention of notable changes, it is simply just a screenshot of Terminal with a build number. These pages are even less notable than the [https://betawiki.net/wiki/BetaWiki:Community_portal#Purging_Vibranium_(Win10_2004_thru_21H2)_and_Cobalt_(Win11)_update_pages| Win10/11 CUs] that were removed a few weeks ago.<br />
With that being said, I don't doubt that these builds are legit, and the guidelines do state that <code>The build has been mentioned by a proper source</code> but are the pages that reference the Terminal repo really notable? [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]])<br />
:If this AfD goes through, I may consider opening up another AfD for most other repos as these are as noteworthy as the Terminal pages. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 00:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC) <br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
#I can't see this gaining traction but it's worth a shot in the dark. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 10:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#Agreed, as per above. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 10:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 08:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:WaterMelon|WaterMelon]] ([[User talk:WaterMelon|talk]]) 16:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 14:54, 2 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#I'm sorry.But it's not notable. [[User:Hanhan188|Hanhan188]] ([[User talk:Hanhan188|talk]]) 0:56 June 5, 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Jurta|Jurta]] ([[User talk:Jurta|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jurta|contribs]]) 17:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#So we must delete. ''Offtopic: They must be changed the registry hives.'' [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:5061:2F54:E04D:CC34|2001:F90:40C0:A072:5061:2F54:E04D:CC34]] 03:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
#<s>I can't agree,but you can move to the "Windows 10 Github References builds" page. ([[User talk:Hanhan188|talk]]) 7:22 June 4, 2022 (UTC+8)</s><br />
#:what [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:5538:340E:528D:BC7D|2001:F90:40C0:A072:5538:340E:528D:BC7D]] 08:08, 4 June 2022 (UTC+8)<br />
<br />
== [[Windows 11 build 22621.2]] ==<br />
{{afd close}}<br />
Closed as <code>SSUCompDB_KB5015275.xml</code> file. [[Special:Contributions/2001:f90:40c0:a072:e45d:578f:4740:66d|2001:f90:40c0:a072:e45d:578f:4740:66d]] 17:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC+8)<br />
----<br />
Moved to AFD as the proposed deletion was removed. Reason I gave was <code>This really isn't notable. Hell, it's less notable that most CUs that include no new features.</code>[[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 13:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
#[[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 13:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 08:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#Only proof of its existence is a .json file, don't really see that being notable. [[User:Jurta|Jurta]] ([[User talk:Jurta|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jurta|contribs]]) 12:58, 30 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:WaterMelon|WaterMelon]] ([[User talk:WaterMelon|talk]]) 12:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[Special:Contributions/31.148.163.153|31.148.163.153]] 16:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#I originally added a paragraph to the 22621.1 page for this, as it's the first known CU for the 22H2 RTM. I really don't think it needs its own page. [[Special:Contributions/89.241.109.169|89.241.109.169]] 17:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 15:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:6840:4743:E02B:B5F0|2001:F90:40C0:A072:6840:4743:E02B:B5F0]] 11:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
#I think the "cumulative update" version is necessary, which can display the RTM process of 22h2. {{Unsigned|182.136.148.243}}<br />
:::Other builds are just as capable of doing that, though. [[User:Jurta|Jurta]] ([[User talk:Jurta|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jurta|contribs]]) 12:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)<br />
:::The build table is a good choice, just like the table sandbox of Xeon. If these builds are deleted, they may not be found again. {{Unsigned|182.136.144.98}}<br />
::::As 22614.101, the reference is same as this build. [[Special:Contributions/2001:f90:40c0:a072:e45d:578f:4740:66d|2001:f90:40c0:a072:e45d:578f:4740:66d]] 18:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC+8)<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== [[Sxolinux]] ==<br />
{{Afd close}}<br />
Removed on 29 June 2022. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 22:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
I am not really sure about the notability of this, so let's talk about it. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 13:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===Support===<br />
#Most Linux distributions on the site are also not notable. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 14:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:WaterMelon|WaterMelon]] ([[User talk:WaterMelon|talk]]) 14:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#Per Xeno. A good amount of Linux distros should be purged since they are simply based off the main distros such as Debian and Ubuntu with only package changes. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 15:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 14:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:[[Special:Diff/216588/216599|Don't edit the AfD headers of proposals that are not yours, especially in the middle of an already ongoing discussion.]] What a nice conflict of interests, too. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 15:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:I'm sorry for editing the header. I forgot to read the guidelines first before editing. [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 15:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===Oppose===<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== [[Windows 2000 build 2009]] ==<br />
{{afd close}}<br />
Author requested deletion. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 15:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
It's only a kernel debugger build. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:E45D:578F:4740:66D|2001:F90:40C0:A072:E45D:578F:4740:66D]] 20:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC+8)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
#[[User:Blue Horizon|Blue Horizon]] ([[User talk:Blue Horizon|talk]]) 12:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 14:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== Windows Vista Builds were mentioned in Windows Setup ==<br />
{{Afd close}}<br />
Rejected; pages will be kept. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 02:54, 31 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
I think write these build is not true because the builds were not always existence. --[[User:Hanhan188|Hanhan188]] ([[User talk:Hanhan188|talk]]). 11:27 June 10,2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===Support===<br />
#The setup references to non-existent builds (such as [[Windows Vista build 5019|build 5019]]) is not notable and its more likely fake. [[User:Bubblebeam|Uncle Captain]] ([[User talk:Bubblebeam|talk]]) 23:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===Oppose===<br />
#Why would Microsoft give a reference to a build that does not exist? [[User:Mbczadgjliqetup|XPSrv]] ([[User talk:Mbczadgjliqetup|talk]]) 11:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:This is just a range to update this version. [[User:Hanhan188|Hanhan188]] ([[User talk:Hanhan188|talk]]) 3:56, 11 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#So... that 5223 was not. [[Special:Contributions/2001:f90:40c0:a072:3944:c482:71be:47de|2001:f90:40c0:a072:3944:c482:71be:47de]] 9:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC+8)<br />
#Per Mbczadgjliqetup. Those builds were compiled by Microsoft; just not available yet. Otherwise that would be saying client 4028 doesn't exist because it's mentioned in build 4039 - 4093 setup and hasn't leaked yet. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 02:56, 11 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 06:16, 11 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#They're not fake. Especially 5019 given that [[Windows Vista build 5048]] has a document listing various bugs that will occur during an upgrade when using builds 5019 or higher. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 14:21, 21 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:"1. OS being upgraded is a build lower than 5019" [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:8DE7:26:2517:B3F2|2001:F90:40C0:A072:8DE7:26:2517:B3F2]] 00:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)<br />
#I completely disagree here. The Windows Vista builds that are mentioned in Windows Setup are not fake. [[User:Brennan1234567890|Brennan1234567890]] ([[User talk:Brennan1234567890|talk]]) 19:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#I think we should cancel this AFD. [[User:Faynti|Faynti]] ([[User talk:Faynti|talk]]) 19:37, 4 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Blue Horizon|Blue Horizon]] ([[User talk:Blue Horizon|talk]]) 21:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#Those builds probably exists, just they need to be found (or wait for them to came to us). • [[User:Kiki79250CoC|Kiki79250CoC]] <sup>([[User talk:Kiki79250CoC|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kiki79250CoC|Contribs]] • [[User:Kiki79250CoC/ToasterSpecs|My Toaster™ specs]])</sup> 21:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:What? Windows Vista was end on 11 April 2017. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:8DEC:DBEC:F6A2:A941|2001:F90:40C0:A072:8DEC:DBEC:F6A2:A941]] 04:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== [[:File:10.0.18200.png]], [[:File:19500.jpg]] and [[:File:18943 mention.png]] ==<br />
this [[:File:10.0.18200.png|screenshot]] is looking like appxmanifest.xml a bit (minversion). We don't upload screenshots with MinVersion value which appears in every appxmanifest.xml. who agree with me? - [[User:Faynti|Faynti]] 11:53 (UTC), 03.07.2022<br />
<br />
:Nobody is responding, huh? - [[User:Faynti|Faynti]] 11:13 (UTC), 04.07.2022<br />
:Prosupe deletion is on that page. Maybe you should remove it. And... <br />
:#It was mentioned on GitHub.<br />
:#There is also a reference of 21251.0. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9|2001:F90:40C0:A072:958A:2177:A4A8:83B9]] 01:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
:I didn't meant a page, i did meant a screenshot which shown system requirements in store. system requirements does use <code>AppxManifest.xml</code>. - [[User:Faynti|Faynti]] 7:54 (UTC), 05.07.2022<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
#[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 12:11, 4 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Faynti|Faynti]] ([[User talk:Faynti|talk]]) 12:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
<br />
== [[Windows 1.0 Final Beta Release]] ==<br />
{{afd close}}<br />
Recently rejected. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 03:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
It's just an unnoteworthy fake. {{Unsigned|Winbetas}}<br />
:It cannot be moved to Hell of Shame [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:353E:36F:C6FA:FEE6|2001:F90:40C0:A072:353E:36F:C6FA:FEE6]] 03:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
#Last time this was proposed, it was received with vague responses beyond reasoning about how it should be kept for historical record, yet it hasn't even been manually put back to the main list article itself. Besides being passed around OSBetaArchive back in the day, not once have I seen anyone bring this up, meaning this would be essentially forgotten had it not been for someone creating an article about it. It also doesn't help the article's case that it lacks a concrete reference, source, or any information about who or where the screenshots came from other than it originates from OSBA according to word of mouth. Having articles for faked builds is meaningless if there aren't any credible sources to back it up with or is otherwise not fooling a majority of people. --[[User:Blue Horizon|Blue Horizon]] ([[User talk:Blue Horizon|talk]]) 15:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
# [[BetaWiki:Articles_for_deletion/Archive_4#Windows_1.0_Final_Beta_Release|This was already proposed not long ago and was rejected]]. [[User:BF10|BF10]] ([[User talk:BF10|talk]]) 02:56, 31 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== [[Windows Longhorn build 4064]] ==<br />
This build isn't notable as the reference is just part of a cmdlet and doesn't even contain a full tag. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 12:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
# [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 12:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 15:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:RealOrFake|RealOrFake]] ([[User talk:RealOrFake|talk]]) 11:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
# Also delete the image that mentions build 4064. [[User:Brennan1234567890|Brennan1234567890]] 20:28, 27 August 2022<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
# The fact that an assembly does not have a tag does not mean that this assembly does not exist. In this case, I am surprised that such assemblies as 4000, 4059, 5019, 5027 still exist on the site, Because they don't even have a tag, but only some records. {{Unsigned|EvoAndОбзорщик}}<br />
:::Those builds should be deleted alongside this build, then. [[User:Jurta|Jurta]] ([[User talk:Jurta|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jurta|contribs]]) 17:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== [[Windows 10 build 19045.1826]] ==<br />
{{afd close}}<br />
Close as AfD template removed. [[Special:Contributions/60.246.37.16|60.246.37.16]] 09:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
<br />
A few months ago, several non-notable Windows 10/11 updates were removed from the wiki. 19045.1826 is just 19044.1826 with the enablement packages installed, and 19044 does not contain any notable changes. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 14:34, 16 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
# [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 14:34, 16 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 15:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
# There is no such thing like [[Windows 10 build 19045.789]] [[Special:Contributions/60.246.37.16|60.246.37.16]] 09:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== Pages that use compliance.ini / cversion.ini as their reference ==<br />
{{afd close|}}<br />
Pages deleted. [[User:Starfrost|Starfrost]] ([[User talk:Starfrost|talk]]) 12:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
These pages should be removed as they are not noteworthy. Plus some don't make any sense, take [[Windows 8 build 8090]] for example, builds between 8045 and 8064 mention 8090. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 13:41, 1 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
#[[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 13:41, 1 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#The users who have opposed's entire reasoning is essentially "I don't agree with it because you agree with someone I don't like" and "It exists therefore it should be documented". I don't think I need to state why this line of reasoning is nonsensical. Some of the cversion builds are blatantly implausible. [[User:Starfrost|Starfrost]] ([[User talk:Starfrost|talk]]) 13:15, 4 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:Then why not delete Windows 11 build 22000.37 or most Dev channel CU builds (especially the available ones) aswell? If upgrade references are not notable enough, then these I listed should be even worse. [[User:XPSrv|XPSrv]] ([[User talk:XPSrv|talk]]) 13:24, 4 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:Update: Nevermind, I take it back. [[User:XPSrv|XPSrv]] ([[User talk:XPSrv|talk]]) 15:00, 4 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#We should also delete SSU files [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:59E7:56CF:8B5D:40E6|2001:F90:40C0:A072:59E7:56CF:8B5D:40E6]] 05:31, 7 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#[[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 11:56, 7 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
# I don't think they're non-notable though. Also I think you just opened AfD with exact same reason as user Hanhan188. [[User:XPSrv|XPSrv]] ([[User talk:XPSrv|talk]]) 14:10, 1 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:What makes them notable, then? --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 12:17, 4 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#{{quote|The original cversion.ini file has the build number 7233.0 for the minimum client OS build identifying the minimum Windows 7 build which can be officially upgraded to Windows 7 RTM (Released to Manufacture) edition.<br><br>So when we alter the cversion.ini for a suitable build number which will let you continue installation process, we can finish successfully installing Windows7.}}<br />
<br />
7233 also have cversion.ini. cversion.ini is actually Desktop_neutral_Forward_9374.0.fbl_partner_out15.130329-2355.CompDB.xml.<br />
[[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:6932:F2B1:963E:3AA3|2001:F90:40C0:A072:6932:F2B1:963E:3AA3]] 12:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC) ([https://www.kodyaz.com/articles/upgrade-windows-7-rc-to-win7-rtm-edit-cversion.ini.aspx Link])<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== [[Microsoft]] and [[Google LLC]] ==<br />
<br />
I don't really think articles about tech companies themselves rather than their products are within BetaWiki's scope. They're also never going to reach the same level as the same pages on Wikipedia, so maybe we should just take advantage of interwiki links there. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 19:59, 4 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
# Per above. --{{User:Ryuzaki/Signature}} 19:59, 4 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
# I would agree for [[Google LLC]] but I'm undetermined for [[Microsoft]]. [[User:XPSrv|XPSrv]] ([[User talk:XPSrv|talk]]) 20:19, 4 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
# Agreed. They're not notable and they are outside of our scope. [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 20:06, 4 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
# You mean manufacturer pages like this are unambiguously beyond BetaWiki's scope? [[User:Bubblebeam|Uncle Captain]] ([[User talk:Bubblebeam|talk]]) 20:36, 4 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 11:56, 7 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
# Yeah, these pages are not notable. Probably move them to the Hall of Shame. [[User:Brennan1234567890|Brennan1234567890]] ([[User talk:Brennan1234567890|talk]]) 15:37, 7 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#::: Why Hall of Shame? Especially with MS [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 10:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#:::: BetaWiki is not a source for companies and games. [[User:Brennan1234567890|Brennan1234567890]] ([[User talk:Brennan1234567890|talk]]) 17:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#You can find these pages on Wikipedia - [[User:Someone|Someone]] ([[User talk:Someone|talk]]) 10:43, 21 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
#Disagree here [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94|2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94]] 10:45, 29 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===<br />
<br />
== [[:File:Xbox One OS Latest Home.png]] ==<br />
{{Afd close}}<br />
Closed, being moved to quick deletion. [[Special:Contributions/Litillene|Litillene<br />
]] 16:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
----<br />
[[File:Xbox One OS Latest Home.png|thumb]]<br />
New file would be uploaded because png upload was 4 mb limit for size, so it will be uploaded in webp), and uploaded as separate file (duplicate), I can't redirect an original ppng because can't of the format {{Unsigned|Faynti}}<br />
:Becuase this is taken from a video [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:C4:45D6:3068:8665|2001:F90:40C0:A072:C4:45D6:3068:8665]] 03:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
</div><br />
<br />
== Symbol server builds ==<br />
<br />
I don't think these builds are notable. Because just having a few files from Microsoft Symbol Servers do not prove that the build is actually compiled. File versions can differ. So these pages should be deleted. [[User:XPSrv|XPSrv]] ([[User_talk:XPSrv|talk]]) 12:17, 27 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===Support===<br />
#[[User:XPSrv|XPSrv]] ([[User_talk:XPSrv|talk]]) 12:17, 27 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===Oppose===<br />
# Ah yes, thousands of files from a build (digitally signed) don't prove it exists. [[User:Starfrost|Starfrost]] ([[User talk:Starfrost|talk]]) 12:22, 27 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
# Disagree here. Sure, some builds currently have a few files, but that can be solved with some brute forcing to obtain other files. The builds on the server can give us a good insight into the development of Windows. (See 7850/7950 ARM32 and 9884). It has also helped us confirm [[Windows 8 build 7758|build 7758]] [[User:Xeno|Xeno]] ([[User talk:Xeno|talk]]) 12:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
# [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 14:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
# It is wrong to delete these pages. Plus, [[Windows 10 build 9884|build 9884]], found on the Symbol server, was the first to use the NT 10.0 kernel version! I was the one to create the [[Windows Server 2012 build 7758]] page as well. So I disagree here. [[User:Brennan1234567890|Brennan1234567890]] 20:24, 27 August 2022<br />
# [[Windows Server 2012 build 7758]]'s creation don't make sense to deletions. So I disagree Brennan1234567890's. Also some of Windows builds is just leaked to all MS servers. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:84CD:5E63:441C:31EC|2001:F90:40C0:A072:84CD:5E63:441C:31EC]] 08:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== [[Sun UNIX 4.2 Release 0.4]] ==<br />
<br />
I originally put this as a proposed deletion, but it wasn't worth it. But the page isn't notable at all, so I'm requesting this page for deletion. -- [[User:Brennan1234567890]] 20:34, 27 August 2022<br />
:That don't seems to make sense. Even every Linux pages has only something on it. [[Special:Contributions/2001:F90:40C0:A072:84CD:5E63:441C:31EC|2001:F90:40C0:A072:84CD:5E63:441C:31EC]] 07:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
:It does make sense for short pages. [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 14:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Support ===<br />
#As I said above. -- [[User:Brennan1234567890]] 20:34, 27 August 2022<br />
#The page itself is too short, and extremely short pages are not notable. [[User:Nara Insider|Nara Insider]] ([[User talk:Nara Insider|talk]]) 14:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=== Oppose ===</div>
2001:F90:40C0:A072:9064:7759:A919:A94