BetaWiki:Articles for deletion

__NEWSECTIONLINK__ Articles for deletion (AfD) is the place where we discuss whether an article should be deleted.

To nominate an article for deletion, add the  template to the top of the article and add a new section below this lead section explaining your rationale.

Early Chicago fakes
I think that the notability of builds 21i, 26, 36, 38, 45, 47 and perhaps more should be reevaluated. All of these were only shown in some old BetaArchive threads and aside from BetaWiki and I can't believe it's not BetaWiki there is no other webpage about these builds so I am not sure if they even have the "potential to confuse people about their legitimacy" as the Guidelines put the conditions on documenting fake builds. -- 22:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * these fakes shouldve been deleted a long time ago. MikeShinoda2001 (Norman) 22:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * No, they really don't have the potential, because of the taskbar. ToMi (talk | contribs) 18:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Gamerappa (talk) 22:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) MikeShinoda2001 (Norman) 22:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) Jurta (talk • contribs) 22:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 4) As partially mentioned by Ryu, these aren't notable fakes. I've not seen anyone in some time try to pass these off as genuine. Xeno (talk) 23:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 5) ToMi (talk | contribs) 18:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 6) Jajan131 (talk) 02:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 7) WinInsider (talk) 02:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Build 47 - Jajan131 (talk) 02:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * build 47 is only mentioned in an old betaarchive thread from 2009. -Gamerappa (talk) 02:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Build 47 is mentioned in TASKMAN.EXE, anyway, I prefer to keep it as a precaution but unconfirmed... Note, there are other executables where there are different build numbers but they match the same suite of past Windows Chicago build numbers but they are unconfirmed too, after all.... I already made a comment about this in April 2014 on BetaArchive ! - Jajan131 (talk) 03:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Win8-801-.png
There's no source on this image and it potentially could be fake. Xeno (talk) 18:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Xeno (talk) 18:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) ToMi (talk | contribs) 18:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) Jurta (talk • contribs) 18:37, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 4) MikeShinoda2001 (Norman) 21:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) --Vannura (talk) 21:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC) I think i found that version, probably this build is Windows 8 build 8011.

File:Microsoftteamsdemo.png
Dear BetaWiki Owners, please delete this fast immediately. https://betawiki.net/wiki/Special:NewFiles#/media/File:Microsoftteamsdemo.png thank you because it has names

Support

 * 1) 我是王牌66 (talk) 02:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

User:User:Orangera1n/testingrooms/testingroom2 and User:User:Orangera1n/testingrooms/testingroom3/Minecraft
On Administrators' noticeboard, User:Orangera1n said when he/she was redesigning his/her user page and testingrooms, he/she accidently created those pages. Can guys delete them?? —我是王牌66 (talk) 01:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

When I was insert or  template to the pages, the edit notice as shown below:

So when I have inspected this warning, I go to this page and have a report. —我是王牌66 (talk) 02:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) 我是王牌66 (talk) 01:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) Orangera1n (Talk | contribs)  02:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC) I want the redirect deleted, not the page it redirects to.
 * 3) WinInsider (talk) 02:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Windows Server 2016 build 10513
With some fake builds, in the AfD will deleted that fake build, but this page was recreating.

It looks like it, but these are still just random files from that build, so i still think the article should go away. --我是王牌66 (talk) 02:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) It's a different source lol. Xeno (talk) 02:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) And the source that was mentioned in the page was Channel 9. WinInsider (talk) 02:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) MikeShinoda2001 (Norman) 02:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) 我是王牌66 (talk) 02:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)