BetaWiki:Articles for deletion

__NEWSECTIONLINK__ Articles for deletion (AfD) is the place where we discuss whether an article should be deleted.

To nominate an article for deletion, add the  template to the top of the article and add a new section below this lead section explaining your rationale.

Windows Server 2016 build 10513
this page claims that various files from this build are available to download from a "RemoteIE" server, but it doesnt specify which exactly. This is why i think this page should be deleted. In addition, remoteie has been offline for quite some time according to my little knowledge i have of this thing. Norman (talk) 03:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This should be related IMO, IDK if they're still up. CI611 (talk) 04:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


 * looks like it, but these are still just random files from that build, so i still think the article should go. Norman (talk) 04:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Ref to Windows_10_build_10585 I don't think this page should simply go since the files we can get is much more than a single ntoskrnl.exe, surely this dump is far from complete and usable but there might stand a chance to get it running with 10512's files. Anyway I won't state my opinion and it's up to you guys to make the final conclusion. CI611 (talk) 14:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Norman (talk) 03:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) Xeno (talk) - I don't agree that solely file versions should be allowed. References to builds in the file itself are acceptable to me. 03:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) I do agree with Xeno. ToMi (talk | contribs) 09:41, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I mentioned this on the talk page already. The IP who uploaded the screenshot is blocked and there is absolutely no source for either the screenshot or the build tag. I believe it should be removed for this reason. -- Ryuzaki  (talk | contribs) 11:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) Yeah i agree it should be removed. There is no source for that screenshot whatsoever Norman 11:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) Reverse image searching redirects to this article, no source so it should be gone.Winins (talk) 11:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 4) No source provided and created by an IP lowers my trust in this being legit. Xeno (talk) 11:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)