Talk:Windows NT 4.0

Editions table
Is it really needed to use a table for the editions? I am sure a regular list would do better. --AlphaBeta (talk) 04:26, 30 November 2015 (GMT)
 * I table markup. It makes it easier to see, at least for me. Tau Ceti (talk) 03:44, 11 December 2015 (GMT)
 * Having a template for support and denial also is unneeded, especially when it breaks the page layout. --AlphaBeta (talk) 12:49, 15 December 2015 (GMT)
 * I did not feel that an entire heading was necessary for each edition... User99672 (talk) 04:33, 11 December 2015 (GMT)
 * That's an other extreme. --AlphaBeta (talk) 12:49, 15 December 2015 (GMT)

Are there "official" RC builds of NT 4.0?
As builds 1345 (RC1) and 1369 (RC2) are not described as "official" Release Candidate builds, were they actually confirmed by MS as "official" RC builds? -   Click here to begin. Or here. 12:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)