Talk:Windows 11 build 22000.1

Contents of SKUs and architectures from table should be added into the infobox
Why are we keeping the infobox just the compile date, desktop screenshot, and the build's Winver? Wabbah (talk) 16:09, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Wabbah (PLANNED TO BE RENAMED TO Sacre Bleu)
 * We're keeping it because 22000.1 is a build of Windows 11, why would we remove it? Xeno (talk) 16:10, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * wabbah was talking about the skus on the infobox Norman 16:11, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The SKUs and architectures are already listed in the article outside of the infobox. Orbitron (talk) 16:12, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I like it if the SKUs and the arcitectures are in the infobox. Here a example:
 * The table is way cleaner and easier to read than slapping everything into the infobox and not even accounting for the fact N editions are not available for ARM64. -- Ryuzaki (talk | contribs) 01:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Bugs
I am know, that is updated build for 21996 and no bugs? Egor819795 (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)