User talk:InfinityPlus1

OOBE
I know that 2223 is the earliest build to include OOBE, but it is not usable before build 2416. Is it possible, through registry hacking and the like, to launch OOBE in earlier builds (like KenOath did for 2257)? Tau Ceti (talk) 22:50, 20 March 2015 (GMT)
 * The early Whistler OOBEs, as far as I can tell, are just really a hack of the Windows Me OOBE. If you can, try using sysprep, else, try msoobe /f User99672 (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2015 (GMT)
 * That explains why they look so much like Windows Me! Thank you. I will try on build 2257. Tau Ceti (talk) 23:10, 21 March 2015 (GMT)
 * Also note: The Windows Whistler startup sound is a hoax. Whistler has the 2000 sounds and the fake one is just the 2000 one reversed. Tau Ceti (talk) 23:12, 21 March 2015 (GMT)
 * If you're talking to me lol, I've known all of that for ages...I also wrote a whole guide to the Windows Me OOBE on BA...I've been doing the "beta scene" thing a few more years....lol User99672 (talk) 01:16, 23 March 2015 (GMT)
 * I wasn't talking to you... And I used that guide to install Windows Me several times. Tau Ceti (talk) 06:59, 23 March 2015 (GMT)
 * a bit difficult when there's literally nobody else in this discussion. Let's reference ea. other by username in the future perhaps? By that, I mean, wiki-wide. User99672 (talk) 17:15, 23 March 2015 (GMT)
 * @Tau Ceti Yes, the longhorn sounds is a hoax too... XP had 2000 sounds until 2481, and Vista until a pre-rc1 build (IDK which one). As for the OOBE, it doesn't suprise me if it's taken from ME, as much stuff in Neptune too as well as Whistler is from ME, e.g. the Help and Support prototype...--Ovctvct (talk) 19:02, 23 March 2015 (GMT)
 * Yes, and the Neptune activity centres actually say 'Windows Millennium'. The vista build you mean is 5536.16384 (I believe). Tau Ceti (talk) 10:26, 24 March 2015 (GMT)

Your 'contributions'
are literally crap. You have absolutely no skills what so ever. All you've done for the year or so you've been in the beta scene, is parrot and copy people (usually me!), and reword it so it looks like it's a valid contribution. You have literally plagiarized from longhorn.ms, and poorly to boot! The Windows 3.0 ISV article? You copied and pasted from the Interface Manager DR5 article and changed a few words around.

What does the main page say? It's not advised to copy and paste content from other sites. Please do your own research and write the article in your own words.''' Please, put some effort into the articles. People visiting BetaWiki will more appreciate longer, more interesting articles than articles with just a one sentence long description of the build.

If you did what you do online at school, you would be expelled. Don't even think about going to a university if this is all you are capable of doing, you'll be laughed out the door. User99672 (talk) 07:39, 11 May 2015 (BST)