User talk:MikeShinoda2001

You need to chill
Your constant edits have made people concerned about your health, and they can get pretty annoying at times, as other people are trying to edit those same pages. Whenever someone creates a page, give around 5-10 minutes before your edit, as the original author is likely trying to fix the page. Orbitron (talk) 12:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please take care of yourself
You have been constantly editing non-stop for extended periods of time (at most 14 hours of editing each day) and in turn have caused people around the BetaWiki community to be highly concerned about both your health and mental wellbeing. I highly recommend that you please take a break from editing immediately before your health deteriorates further.

Please listen to us. - pivotman319 (📫) 13:10, 6 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I agree with Pivot. You don't have to really bother with this wiki if low-quality edits are what concerns you, we already have that covered. --AhmadB (talk) 13:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Build list
Can you please tell me why did you copypasted the Milestone 1 and 2 parts of the Windows 8 build list from BetaArchive Wiki? ToMi (talk | contribs) 13:50, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * what?? I am not even ON ba wiki Norman 13:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, I'm probably misunderstooding. https://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/index.php?title=Windows_8&oldid=451777: I was recently adding missing builds to the BA Wiki page and I slightly rewrote the first part of the buildlist, and I see the this wiki's part of the list is exactly the same (namely removing the "100???-????" from the "7788.fbl_uex_cxe_dev" build string, which I did on BA). ToMi (talk | contribs) 13:59, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * yeah ryu removed it on the 7788 page, so i decided to remove that string on the win8 page Norman 14:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, I apologize then. ToMi (talk | contribs) 14:02, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Harsh Comments
Hello. Can you please avoid harsh comments toward new users? Thanks. AhmadB (talk) 15:17, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * sorry, just getting tired of having to add proper references manually all the time (ip that added it in is notourious for adding unsourced leak dates) Norman 15:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

They are still helping the wiki, you don’t need to be so impatient, try to be more supportive of their work. Joe2005 (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I know that, I just dont like unsourced information. Norman 15:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

You could try and talk to them or be patient still... Joe2005 (talk) 15:35, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Don't listen to them
Norman is one of the greatest editors this wiki has to offer. If they choose to edit and fix articles on a regular basis, that's their life choice. Personally, that's what keeps me motivated to add to the wiki in the first place, as its like having a sidekick come along and edit articles with you. Blue Horizon 05:06, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok nice bro👍 --85.203.44.146 13:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Dubious. 86.9.189.243 23:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

macOS Big Sur
So i am very curious about why did you add x to Big Sur version after 11, but you didn't add an x to Catalina for example. Would be 10.15.x in that case. Miranoao (talk) 23:17, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * alright, i added x to all other macos versions Norman 02:23, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * This isn't what i meant though, even Wikipedia has listed Big Sur as just macOS 11 Big Sur without x Miranoao (talk) 15:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Question
Can you look at the user’s talk page please? There is still serve vandalism... for like 4 hours! BGRComputers.co (talk) 04:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * yeah that wont do anything... your best bet is to wait for the admins (goddamn wish i was one rn but im not) Norman 04:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Me too, I wish I could, but I’m not. BGRComputers.co (talk) 04:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Norman, I will help you fight the vandal. Nara Insider (talk) 05:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Abandoning the word "leaked" in build articles
For some reason, you and the BetaWiki admin look like they're abandoning the word "leaked" in some build articles. Do you have a reason for this?
 * this decision was done nearly a year ago. -Gamerappa (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

there shouldn't be categories for builds of service packs.
the "windows 2000 service pack 2" category makes no sense as the SP2 builds should just be placed on the "windows 2000" category. Gamerappa (talk) 17:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think there should be categories for os updates and service packs, you know like windows 98 se, server 2003 r2 and windows 10 updates, the latter i will do soon Norman 17:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * at least add the "windows 2000 builds" category on the win2k sp2 category -Gamerappa (talk) 17:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure Norman 17:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)