Talk:Windows 95 build 47

Definitive Proof?
The logic here "However, this build definitely exists, because in early leaked builds (58s, 73g, 78, and 81), the version number of TASKMAN.EXE was 4.00.47. " is not sound. Who says that all components of Windows have to have the same build number? Who says this piece of code didn't have a specific team and builds for it? I do not believe that this is definitive in any way that there is a build 47. Also...no offense, but I think the credibility of the "George Wolfowitz" video is questionable. It's all very possible that it's simply a hacked 58. User99672 (talk) 06:06, 7 January 2015 (GMT)