Talk:Microsoft Cairo

Is this supposed to be here? (Made when the user "Microsft Windows XP", yes that's his username, did the hall of shame version of this.) --LilShootDawg (talk) 18:53, 22 May 2017 (BST)

Yes, it is --Meow2004 (talk) 19:27, 22 May 2017 (BST)

Windows Cairo isn't a codename of Windows NT 4.0, Wikipedia says " Cairo was the codename for a project at Microsoft from 1991 to 1996. Its charter was to build technologies for a next-generation operating system that would fulfill Bill Gates' vision of "information at your fingertips." Cairo never shipped, although portions of its technologies have since appeared in other products." I don't think this should be here without a build list if there even is enough evidence for a build list. (Sorry for the long post) --LilShootDawg (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2017 (BST)

Breaking the Guidelines?
The page as written by "Microsoft Windows XP" (https://betawiki.net/index.php?title=Microsoft_Cairo&oldid=15724) also breaks the guidelines, so I would recommend a revision of the page. That includes claims about screenshot fakery that isn't relevant to a general topic page. —Foxlet (talk) 20:43, 26 September 2017 (BST)
 * Thanks for cleaning this up. --LilShootDawg (talk) 19:08, 26 September 2017 (BST)
 * Also remember to sign comments with the button with the writing in cursive. --LilShootDawg (talk) 19:10, 26 September 2017 (BST)

3.5.841.1???
I'm really curious as to when this was leaked, as claimed by this page, and where it came from, etc.--Overdoze (talk) 08:39, 2 September 2018 (BST)
 * I think 841 is a mislabel as no build was leaked with that number, only 854. 854 was leaked by BA member Darkstar on May 14th, 2010. You can check for more info here,here, and here. --ATeamInc (talk) 10:15, 2 September 2018 (BST)
 * Actually I have just noticed that build 854.1 is mentioned in the NT 3.5 page. This wiki really needs LOTS of proper documentation and revision, much like the Longhorn/Vista pages which I am currently working on. Someday in the future I might reach NT 3.5, but I am not sure yet. Don't expect to see me until late next year though, as unfortunately my school has come. --ATeamInc (talk) 10:26, 2 September 2018 (BST)

Well then 841 should be removed from this page since it doesn't exist. 854 should remain on the NT 3.5x page IMO.--Overdoze (talk) 10:41, 2 September 2018 (BST)

Why is 297 confirmed?
IMO unleaked = unconfirmed. I want to hear other opinions about this. ATeamInc (talk) 08:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC)